Why Are Ionic Compounds Hard & Brittle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hardness and brittleness of ionic compounds, exploring the underlying reasons for these properties in comparison to alloys and other types of bonding. Participants examine the structural characteristics of ionic compounds and how they respond to external forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that ionic compounds are hard and brittle due to the strong binding of component atoms in a crystal structure, limiting atomic movement.
  • Others argue that the behavior of ionic compounds differs significantly from alloys, which involve metallic bonding that allows for more flexibility and movement of atoms.
  • A participant describes a scenario where applying force to an ionic crystal can lead to dislocation, causing electrostatic repulsion between like-charged ions, which contributes to the material's brittleness.
  • Questions arise about the arrangement of ions in the lattice structure, specifically regarding the positioning of Na+ ions and their surrounding Cl- ions, and how this affects the material's properties.
  • One participant speculates on the nature of lattice connections and the potential for cracking due to dislocation and electrostatic forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the mechanisms behind the hardness and brittleness of ionic compounds, with no consensus reached on specific details of the lattice structure or the comparison to alloys.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the arrangement of ions and the effects of external forces on ionic crystals, but there are unresolved questions regarding the specifics of ionic bonding and lattice interactions.

Jadaav
Messages
175
Reaction score
1
Why are ionic compounds hard and brittle ?

For instance, an alloy is a mixture of 2 or more elements and thus does not break easily relative to original elements. Shouldn't the ionic compounds also be like the alloys ?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Jadaav said:
Why are ionic compounds hard and brittle ?

For instance, an alloy is a mixture of 2 or more elements and thus does not break easily relative to original elements. Shouldn't the ionic compounds also be like the alloys ?

An alloy usually involves metallic elements and metallic bonding, very different from ionic bonding. I think ionic compounds are hard and brittle, because its component atoms are very strongly bound to each other and form a crystal structure, which means atoms don't have much leeway to move. In mettallic compounds, on the other hand, atoms are as if swimming in a sea of their (and other atom's) electrons, meaning they can slide and move morea easily.
 
imagine a crystal of alternating Na+ and Cl- ions. You take a hammer and hit it. The Na+ and Cl- ions move around their equilibrium points, as you expect, and return to equilibrium after vibrating. However if you hit the crystal hard enough, you'll dislocate a section of it that happens to align Na+ on one face to Na+, and you get electrostatic repulsion that breaks the crystal apart very quickly. This is the rough reason for why cracks propagate extremely quickly in ionic crystals.
 
Thanks to both of you :) I now understand how it works.

Concerning the dislocation of the lattice structure, What did you meant by " align Na+ on one face to Na+ " ?

Isn't the Na+ surrounded by 6 Cl- ions ?
 
Jadaav said:
Thanks to both of you :) I now understand how it works.

Concerning the dislocation of the lattice structure, What did you meant by " align Na+ on one face to Na+ " ?

Isn't the Na+ surrounded by 6 Cl- ions ?

Maybe in the depths of the lattice, yes, but what about on the edges / faces?
 
So I presume each lattice isn't connected to each other by ionic bonding, am I right ?

One lattice has a layer on it ( inside which are the ions ) and which is could be cracked by hitting and then the whole object dislocating with electrostatic repulsion.

That's what I could imagine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
16K