Why are Localized Fringes Curved in a Michelson Interferometer Experiment?

Click For Summary
Localized fringes in a Michelson interferometer appear curved when the mirrors are not perfectly perpendicular, creating a wedge effect. This deviation results in concentric circles that may shift off-center on the viewing screen. The discussion highlights that while nearly perpendicular mirrors yield a standard interference pattern, variations in wavefront shape can lead to different fringe configurations, including linear or irregular patterns. The type of light source, whether extended or point, also influences the observed fringe pattern, with plane-wave light producing straight fringes. Understanding these nuances is crucial for applications in lens testing and optical assembly.
spadille
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi everyone,
can anyone explain why localised fringes are curved in michelson interferometer experiment with a monochromatic light used, when the mirrors are held not exactly perpendicular to each other and there is wedge formation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the interference pattern of a Michelson interferometer consists of concentric circles, and the viewing screen shows only a small part of the pattern. When the mirrors are exactly perpendicular, the center of the circles is at the center of the screen. When the mirrors are not perpendicular, the center of the circles is beyond the edges of the screen.

[added] Actually, this is only an approximate description, which is pretty good when the mirrors are nearly perpendicular. For a more complete description see here for example:

http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/cabell_f/diffractionfinal/pages/Michelson.htm
 
Last edited:
Hang on there- the fringes are concentric circles (etc...) if the wavefront entering the device is diverging/converging. It's possible to have linear fringes (flat wavefront, mirrors tilted with respect to each other) or all kinds of oddball shapes which reflect the aberrations/Zernike polynomials present in the wavefront:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zernike_polynomials2.png

Evaluating these types of fringes are important in terms of lens testing/assembly.
 
thanx Andy and jtbell..
 
Your source it too close to the beam splitter. You said “localized fringes” so you must be using an extended source. You must be viewing the fringes through a telescope or other imaging arrangement to view the image which is located on the surface of the beam splitter (Born and Wolf, 6th edition, p301).

When viewed through a lens, an extend source produces the same fringe pattern as a point source. (Imagine the extended source being imaged with pin-hole lens on an image plane. Only one ray from each point of the source reaches the image plane, except those destructively interfered in the interferometer.)

Straight fringes are produced by plane-wave light as produced by a laser or a point source located a long way away. If you focused your laser beam, the image will be located at the focal point. To get plane wave light the image (or light source) has to be a long way away.

You could look at http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys5430/phys5430_sp01/PDF%20files/Michelson%20Interferometer.pdf, p5.7. For non curved fringes rp would tend to infinity which would happen if ds were very large.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K