Why are more stable carbocations faster formed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sludger13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between carbocation stability and the activation energy of chemical reactions. It is established that more stable carbocations, such as tertiary (3°) carbocations, facilitate faster reactions due to their lower activation energy and greater reaction enthalpy. The stability of the carbocation influences the transition state, which resembles the carbocation more than the neutral reactants, thereby affecting the overall reaction rate. Additionally, steric hindrance plays a crucial role in the reversibility of reactions involving different degrees of carbocation stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of carbocation stability (1°, 2°, 3°)
  • Knowledge of activation energy and transition states
  • Familiarity with reaction enthalpy concepts
  • Basic principles of organic chemistry and reaction mechanisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of steric hindrance in organic reactions
  • Study the mechanisms of carbocation formation and stability
  • Explore the concept of transition states in chemical reactions
  • Learn about reaction enthalpy and its impact on reaction rates
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of chemical reactions involving carbocations.

sludger13
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how activation energy of a chemical reaction (in either direction) could depend on the thermodynamic stability of formed carbocation, as a product of that reaction. Activation energy of a chemical reaction should depend only on the structure of reagents, right?

The only thing I'm considering is that the more stable is a carbocation, the greater is the reaction enthalpy, thus it could (maybe) better heat the remaining reagents. And with greater Ek of that particles, then the reaction really run faster.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Or, the structure of (1°, 2°, 3°) carbon substitueted REAGENTS really prevent
from elimination of carbocation differently...
 
Activation energy isn't the only factor. The extent to which a reaction occurs is the sum total of the forward and reverse reactions, which happen continuously. Most everything can and does reverse spontaneously to a certain extent, which is dependent on the stability of the reactants and the products.

In the case of carbocations, the molecule separates into its constituent ions. With enough activation energy, they can reverse and reform the full compound. Repeat ad nauseum. Steric hindrance makes the reversal of 3° more difficult than the reversal of 2° and 1°, but it still happens to a certain extent. These relative amounts of hindrance, and therefore the rate of the reverse reaction, are what determine the overall forward rate.

That's how I came to understand it in my organic classes, which were close to 4 years ago now, so somebody else may be able to explain it better or point out if I happened to get something wrong.
 
Activation energy is the difference in energy between the reactands and the transition state. The factors stabilizing the Carbocation are also important in the stabilization of the transition state which resembles more the carbocation than the neutral reactands.
 
DrDu said:
Activation energy is the difference in energy between the reactands and the transition state. The factors stabilizing the Carbocation are also important in the stabilization of the transition state which resembles more the carbocation than the neutral reactands.
This explanation seems fair to me, thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K