MHB Why Are My Logarithmic Equation Solutions Extraneous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the logarithmic equation $\log(2-x) + \log(3-x) = \log(12)$. The user initially finds the solutions $x=2$ and $x=3$, but both are extraneous due to the logarithm of zero being undefined. The correct factorization of the quadratic equation should yield $x^2 - 5x - 6 = (x+1)(x-6)=0$, leading to valid solutions of $x=-1$ and $x=6$. The confusion arises from an error in the factorization step. The correct solution to the logarithmic equation is $x=-1$.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Solve for x

$\log\left({2-x}\right)+\log\left({3-x}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({(2-x)(3-x})\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\left(2-x)\right)\left(3-x)\right)=12$
${x}^{2}-5x-6=0$
$\left(x-2)\right)\left(x-3)\right)=0$
$x=2, x=3$

I have a problem with solutions because both is extraneous.

$\log\left({2-2}\right)+\log\left({3-2}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({0}\right)+\log\left({1}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
This solution is extraneous as well as the other solution.

The solution in the back of the book is -1.

Where did I made a mistake?Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Solve for x

$\log\left({2-x}\right)+\log\left({3-x}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({(2-x)(3-x})\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\left(2-x)\right)\left(3-x)\right)=12$
${x}^{2}-5x-6=0$
$\color{red}(x-2)(x-3)=0$
$x=2, x=3$

...

Hello,

I've marked the line where you made a tiny (but fatal) mistake.

After facvtorization you should come out with

$$x^2-5x-6 = (x+1)(x-6)=0$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Just chatting with my son about Maths and he casually mentioned that 0 would be the midpoint of the number line from -inf to +inf. I wondered whether it wouldn’t be more accurate to say there is no single midpoint. Couldn’t you make an argument that any real number is exactly halfway between -inf and +inf?

Similar threads

Back
Top