Why are protons allowed in the nucleus?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew Wright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Protons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why protons are stable within the nucleus, contrasting their behavior with that of electrons. Participants explore concepts related to quantum mechanics, specifically the uncertainty principle, the nature of nuclear forces, and the dynamics of particles within atomic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that electrons cannot fall into the nucleus due to the uncertainty principle, which would require them to have both a defined position and momentum.
  • Others argue that protons, being much more massive than electrons, have different energy configurations and are confined to smaller regions, which may allow them to exist in the nucleus.
  • It is suggested that protons are not attracted to the center of the nucleus in the same way electrons are due to their positive charge being repelled by other protons.
  • Some participants clarify that protons are bound by the strong nuclear force rather than gravitational forces, which are negligible at this scale.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the strong force, with some questioning whether it acts from a central point like gravity or electric forces.
  • Participants mention that the strong force has a limited range and does not act beyond a few femtometers, complicating the analogy to other forces.
  • Some express uncertainty about the concept of "falling" into the nucleus, emphasizing that the interactions at the subatomic level differ from classical physics.
  • There are discussions regarding the role of virtual gluons and their contribution to the effective mass and energy of the nucleus, with differing views on how to describe these interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of forces within the nucleus and the behavior of protons compared to electrons. There is no consensus on several aspects, particularly regarding the interpretation of the strong force and its implications for particle behavior.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of the strong force, the uncertainty principle's application to different particles, and the complexities of virtual particles and their roles in nuclear interactions.

  • #31
PeterDonis said:
The "nucleus" is not one thing; it's multiple particles. Unless you are considering a hydrogen-1 nucleus, but in that case the center of the orbital is where the proton is, so your objections don't even apply to that case in the first place.
I have no idea what you are talking about here. Do you have a reference?
Basic Newton´ s 3rd Law.
A force must have an equal and opposite force. When a proton attracts an electron, the electron must attract the proton with equal and opposite force. Force is rate of change of momentum. You may therefore choose a frame of reference where the momenta of electron and proton are always equal and opposite - once they are such, they stay this way.
Proton is indeed at the centre of orbital on average, just as the electron is at the centre of orbital on average. But proton can only be at the centre of orbital when the electron is at the cusp. When electron moves away from the centre of orbital, so must the proton, by Newton´ s 3rd Law.
But the distance relevant to electrostatic attraction between electron and proton is not the one between electron and the (empty) centre of orbit. It is the (longer, because consisting of both arms) full distance between electron and proton.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
snorkack said:
Basic Newton´ s 3rd Law.

We're not talking Newtonian physics, we're talking quantum mechanics. Nothing you are saying makes sense in quantum mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #33
The OP question has been answered. Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K