Why are some equations considered beautiful in mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JayJohn85
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of beauty and elegance in mathematical equations and proofs. Participants explore subjective interpretations of what makes an equation beautiful, providing examples from various fields of mathematics and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that beauty in equations can be found in their conciseness and far-reaching implications, citing Maxwell's equations as an example.
  • Others propose that beauty arises from the relationship between seemingly unrelated quantities, referencing Euler's identity and the product over prime numbers leading to π²/6.
  • A participant expresses a preference for the product over primes relating to π over Euler's formula, arguing it has deeper significance.
  • Another participant highlights the beauty of proofs, specifically Cantor's diagonal argument and the proof of the infinitude of primes, as equally captivating as equations.
  • Dimensionless groups are mentioned as beautiful constructs that encapsulate complex physical behaviors in a single parameter, with Reynolds number as a notable example.
  • One participant shares an algebraic identity involving homomorphisms as an example of beauty in algebra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that beauty in mathematics is subjective and can manifest in various forms, including equations and proofs. However, multiple competing views on what constitutes beauty and elegance remain, with no consensus on specific examples or definitions.

Contextual Notes

Discussions of beauty are inherently subjective, and participants express differing opinions on specific examples and their significance. The exploration of mathematical beauty includes both equations and proofs, with no resolution on which is more beautiful or why.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to mathematicians, educators, and students exploring the aesthetic aspects of mathematics and the philosophy of mathematical beauty.

JayJohn85
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
What does it exactly mean if a equation is elegance and beautiful? Can you post some examples and your reason for why you find it beautiful?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elegance and beauty are extremely subjective but it is not inconceivable that one would find an equation of physics that was both concise and far reaching in consequence and application to be of a beautiful character. My go to examples are Maxwell's equations recast using differential forms which take the form ##dF = 0, d\star F = 4\pi \star j##. Obviously these are extremely concise and we know of course that Maxwell's equations are far reaching in scope in that they explain the dynamics of the classical electromagnetic field. That these equations codify the nature of this field is quite breathtaking when you look at just how elegant they look.
 
JayJohn85 said:
What does it exactly mean if a equation is elegance and beautiful? Can you post some examples and your reason for why you find it beautiful?
Simple yet generally applicable or relating seemingly unrelated quantities. One example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity
 
Last edited:
My favorite is

[tex]\prod_{p~\text{prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}[/tex]

It's nice because it relates two entirely different quantities, namely prime numbers which arise in number theory, and ##\pi## which is a geometric concept. So it relates two very different fields of mathematics.

I don't like the ##e^{i\pi} + 1 =0## very much, because it is essentially a definition to me. The equation above is much deeper. You can actually check it by entering the LHS in a calculator (or at least, a partial product), and you'll get an approximation to ##\pi##. So I think this is something deeper than Euler's formula.
 
micromass said:
My favorite is

[tex]\prod_{p~\text{prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}[/tex]

It's nice because it relates two entirely different quantities, namely prime numbers which arise in number theory, and ##\pi## which is a geometric concept. So it relates two very different fields of mathematics.

A related one:

[tex]\prod_{p~\text{prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} = \frac{1}{1^s} + \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} + \dots[/tex]
 
Last edited:
dx said:
A related one:

[tex]\prod_{p~\text{prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} = \frac{1}{1^s} + \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} + \dots[/tex]

This also shows that there are infinitely many primes, just take ##s=1##.
 
On a similar note, proofs can also be seen as extremely beautiful and elegant (in my opinion a truly elegant proof is much more captivating than an equation of the same caliber). I refer to the two archetypal examples of an elegant / beautiful proof: the proof of the uncountability of the reals via the diagonal argument as proved by Cantor and Cantor's proof that the cardinality of the power set of a set is strictly greater than that of the set itself. See here for the latter: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~hbe/resource/general/131a.3.06w/cantor.pdf and see here for the former: http://planetmath.org/cantorsdiagonalargument

In the spirit of the above posts on the infinitude of the primes, see here for an elegant / beautiful topological proof of the result: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furstenberg's_proof_of_the_infinitude_of_primes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's my opinion that dimensionless groups are the most beautiful. I.e. the ones that are a single parameter generated by combining other parameters of a given scenario which when substituted into some governing equation for a physical process, dictate the the qualitative behavior based on whether some critical value of the dimensionless group is reached. The obvious example is Reynolds number for turbulence in flow systems, but there are many others.
 
Thank you for the interesting replies.
 
  • #10
One of the most beautiful identities in algebra.
Let [itex]G[/itex] and [itex]H[/itex] be groups and let [itex]f: G \rightarrow H[/itex] be a homomorphism:
[tex] G \diagup ker(f) = f(G) [/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K