Why Are These Functions Time Variant and Non-Causal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The functions g(t) = f(t) + f(-t) and g(t) = f(t/2) are both classified as time variant and non-causal. They are time variant because their outputs change with respect to the time variable "t." The first function is non-causal due to its dependence on negative time (-t), allowing outputs to change before the initial event occurs. The second function is non-causal because it relies on the future value of t/2, which can alter outputs based on future inputs, violating the principle of causality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time variant functions
  • Knowledge of non-causal systems in signal processing
  • Familiarity with mathematical functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of causality in systems theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of time variant systems in signal processing
  • Explore the implications of non-causal systems in control theory
  • Learn about the mathematical definitions of causality and its applications
  • Investigate examples of time variant and non-causal functions in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focused on signal processing, control systems, and mathematical modeling, will benefit from this discussion.

skan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1.g(t) = f(t) + f(-t)
2. g(t)= f(t/2)
can someone pls explain why these functions are time variant and non causal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are my guesses:

They're time variant because they vary with the time variable "t".

The first one is non-causal because because it uses -t (negative time), so the function could have a value before time 0, usually the definition of when an initial event happens. The output could change before the stimulating event.

The second one is non causal because the division of time by 2. This means that the output could change at t=1 second, caused by an event at 2 seconds. This would be non-causal because the output would occur before the stimulating event.

The basic definition of causal is that the output cannot change before an initial event, and all event functions, (closing of a switch, pushing a button..) are defined for t => 0.
 


Both of these functions are considered time variant and non-causal because they both depend on the variable "t," which represents time. A time variant function means that the output of the function changes with respect to time, while a non-causal function means that the output depends on future values of the input, which violates the principle of causality.

In the first function, g(t) is equal to the sum of two functions, f(t) and f(-t). This means that the output of g(t) depends on both the current time (t) and the past time (-t). This makes it time variant because the output changes based on the value of t. Additionally, it is non-causal because it depends on both past and future values of the input, which violates the principle of causality.

In the second function, g(t) is equal to f(t/2). This means that the output of g(t) is dependent on the value of t/2, which changes as time passes. Therefore, the output of g(t) is also changing with respect to time, making it time variant. It is also non-causal because it depends on future values of the input (since t/2 will have a different value in the future), which again, violates the principle of causality.

In summary, both of these functions are time variant because their output changes with respect to time, and they are non-causal because they violate the principle of causality by depending on future values of the input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
905
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K