Why Can Birds Sit Safely on Power Lines but Get Electrocuted When Touching Two?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cummings
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of birds sitting on power lines without getting electrocuted, while also addressing the conditions under which they could be electrocuted by touching two wires. Additionally, there is a question regarding the meaning of ampere-hours in the context of car batteries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to explain the safety of birds on a single power line by referencing voltage uniformity and potential difference. They also inquire about the meaning of ampere-hours in relation to current and charge. Some participants affirm the reasoning and elaborate on the concept of ampere-hours as a unit of charge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing affirmations and clarifications regarding the original poster's reasoning. There is an exploration of the implications of alternating current (AC) and phase differences in relation to the potential for electrocution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of AC power lines and their phase differences, as well as the physical constraints of bird wings in relation to electrical safety. The original poster's questions reflect a need for deeper understanding of electrical concepts.

Cummings
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
2 things,

First, I am asked to describe why a bird can sit on a powerline and not be electrocuted, yet if it spreads it's wings and touches two wires, it will be.

I can understand why it can sit on one. The powerline is all at the same voltage. And so there is no potential to motivate the electricity to move through the bird. It will take the easyest route: across the wire.
If the wire we to suddenly break between the birds feet, then there would be a potential accoss the bird and so current would flow. That, and it has no wire to bypass the bird!

Now, if the bird touched two wires, they would have to be at different potential for the bird to be electrocuted. Is this correct? As there is no potential difference there would be no current passing through the bird.
If there was a difference, then the bird would be electrocuted.


Second, car batteries are somtimes rated in ampere-hours. Does this designate the amount of current, power, energy or charge that is drawn from the battery?

I ruled out power as its the pruduct of the voltage and the current. the other three seem to closly related. Current is the flow of charge, charge carries energy. If i were to pick one, it would be charge. Because ampere's is current and that is the flow of charge coming out of the battery.

Thanks,
Cummings
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) is correct, your reasoning is good.

2) is also correct. Think about this way:

One ampere is one coulomb of charge per second. One ampere for one hour is one coulomb of charge per second for 3600 seconds, or 3600 coulombs. The ampere-hour is a unit of charge.

- Warren
 
Discussing it with fellow students today, the powerlines, being AC would most likely be at different voltages due to their different phases. So, that would couse the potential difference neeced to electrocute a bird.
 
Well, most 3-phase lines are spaced more widely than a bird's wings could stretch, but yes, in principle you are correct.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
19K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K