Why Can Some Elements React to Form Diatomic Molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LogicalAcid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
Most elements can form diatomic molecules, but the stability of these molecules varies. Some diatomic molecules have low energy and are very stable, while others possess higher energy and tend to react with surrounding elements to form more stable compounds. The discussion highlights that asking the same question across multiple threads can be problematic, as it may be seen as cross-posting. Additionally, there is an inquiry into the relationship between energy loss during bonding and the reactivity of elements, suggesting that elements become unreactive when the energy required to separate them is high. The conversation indicates a need for clarification on these concepts.
LogicalAcid
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Can react with other atoms of their element and form diatomic molecules, while others cannot?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You were already told that most elements can form diatomic molecules, but in the case of some elements diatomic molecule is very stable (has very low energy), while in the case of other molecules their energy is relatively high, so they will react with other elements present around to form more stable compounds.

Asking the same question in several threads will not yield different answers, but can get you into trouble, if someone decides to classify it as cross posting.
 
Borek said:
You were already told that most elements can form diatomic molecules, but in the case of some elements diatomic molecule is very stable (has very low energy), while in the case of other molecules their energy is relatively high, so they will react with other elements present around to form more stable compounds.

Asking the same question in several threads will not yield different answers, but can get you into trouble, if someone decides to classify it as cross posting.

I know elements react to stabilize, but elements bond, I'm guessing they lose energy because of the energy it takes for them to react? And then they are unreactive because the energy needed to separate them is high?
 
LogicalAcid said:
I know elements react to stabilize, but elements bond, I'm guessing they lose energy because of the energy it takes for them to react?

No idea what you are trying to say. Please elaborate.
 

Thread 'Gold hydride - what is the significance?'

I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...
View full post »

Similar threads

Question about the bond MO's for diatomic early 2nd period elements
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
How to predict chemical reactions?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Interpreting Energy diagrams for polyatomic molecules
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Undergrad Selection Rules for a Diatomic Molecule?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can we write mass in coefficients of elements in a chemical equation
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Radioactivity and the Periodic Table
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Rationale for 6n+2 rule for the number of pi bonds in a non-cyclic molecule
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
The Definition Of Chemical Elements
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Why does each element only react with certain elements?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Undergrad Diatomic molecules containing potassium
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K