- #1

- 692

- 142

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter HomogenousCow
- Start date

- #1

- 692

- 142

- #2

- 834

- 2

- #3

- 31,226

- 7,937

Murphrid is correct. You can certainly move the term involving Christoffel symbols to the other side from the term involving the coordinate acceleration, but the resulting equation is no longer a tensor equation and does not transform as a tensor does.

However, the non-tensor equation that you have can certainly then be interpreted as an acceleration due to a gravitational force. The gravitational force, however, is clearly a fictitious force and even in this situation cannot be locally distinguished from other fictitious forces such as those due to acceleration or rotation of the coordinate system.

- #4

Matterwave

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,965

- 327

- #5

- 2,479

- 100

"The cornerstone of Einsteins theory,however,is the proposition that gravity is itself a fictitious force(or, rather,that it is indistinguishable from a fictitious force)"

So what is it? Is it considered to be a fictitious force or just indistinguishable from a fictitious force or something else? Thanks if anyone answers.

Try googling What is a "fictitious force"

Caltech 2004 Nobel laureate David politzer writing for "Scientific American"

- #6

- 834

- 2

- #7

Bill_K

Science Advisor

- 4,155

- 201

Share:

- Replies
- 22

- Views
- 6K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 491