Why can you cancel out the dx in u-substitution?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nickadams
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
31 replies · 12K views
micromass said:
This is where choice is used. You can never give exact definition of the [itex]x_n[/itex]. This is why it requires choice.
Hmm, color me skeptical. Why can't you explicitly construct a sequence satisfying [itex]x_n \in (x - \frac{1}{n}, x + \frac{1}{n})[/itex]? For instance, [itex]x_n[/itex] can be the point a third of the way into the interval [itex](x - \frac{1}{n}, x + \frac{1}{n})[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lugita15 said:
Hmm, color me skeptical. Why can't you explicitly construct a sequence satisfying [itex]x_n \in (x - \frac{1}{n}, x + \frac{1}{n})[/itex]? For instance, [itex]x_n[/itex] can be the point a third of the way into the interval [itex](x - \frac{1}{n}, x + \frac{1}{n})[/itex].

Note that you also want [itex]|f(x_n)-f(x)|\geq \varepsilon[/itex].