A Why Can't a Top Quark Decay Into a Charm or Up Quark?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Quark
Click For Summary
A top quark cannot decay into a charm or up quark due to the constraints of the Standard Model, which lacks a direct interaction vertex for such transitions. While it is theoretically possible through rare loop processes, these events have never been observed experimentally. The strong interaction prohibits quark transitions, while the weak interaction only allows transformations between up-type and down-type quarks via W boson coupling. Observations indicate that flavor-changing neutral currents, like those involving b to s or b to d transitions, are allowed, but similar processes for top quarks are not. The rarity of potential interactions and the absence of evidence support the conclusion that such decays do not occur.
Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have a very basic question : why a top quark for example cannot decay into a charm or up quark ?

The fact is that I don't really understand where the concept of up- and down-type quark come from (except that they have the same charge). Why a up-type quark cannot transform into another up-type quark ? Is this only an experimental fact or is there a theoretical result prohibiting it ?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Standard Model has no vertex with a top quark and charm or up. It can still happen via loop processes, but it's so rare we have never seen it. We do see b->s and b->d transitions, however. This is called flavor-changing neutral current.
Why is there no such vertex? Well, ultimately it's a result of observations. You can write down theories that have such an interaction, but they don't seem to exist, or they must be so rare that we haven't seen them. The strong interaction doesn't allow any quark transitions, and the weak interaction only allows up-type to down-type and vice versa via coupling to the W boson (which has an electric charge).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Paul159
Thank you very much.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...

Similar threads