Why Can't "Fluid in Lungs" Just be "Sucked" Out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the medical challenges associated with removing fluid from the lungs, particularly in the context of COVID-19. Participants explore the feasibility of suctioning fluid and the implications for lung function, treatment methods, and the nature of secretions in the respiratory system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why fluid in the lungs cannot simply be suctioned out, suggesting a lack of understanding of the medical procedures involved.
  • Another participant explains that suctioning is impractical due to the small size of alveoli and the risk of collapsing them, which could lead to further complications.
  • It is noted that suctioning is performed on ventilated patients to remove mucus from the endotracheal tube, but this does not address fluid in the alveoli.
  • A participant raises a question about the source of mucus that accumulates in the endotracheal tube, leading to clarification about its secretion by goblet cells and the role of cilia in the bronchial epithelium.
  • Concerns are expressed about the terminology used to describe "fluid in the lungs," which may refer to different conditions such as edema, complicating the understanding of lung function in severe COVID-19 cases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and implications of fluid in the lungs, with some clarifying the nature of secretions and others questioning the effectiveness of suctioning methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approaches to manage fluid in the lungs.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of lung physiology and the limitations of current medical interventions, including the potential for misunderstanding common terms related to lung conditions.

kyphysics
Messages
685
Reaction score
445
One aspect of COVID-19 I read about is getting fluid in the lungs.

This is possibly a very dumb question from a completely non-science/non-medical person, but why can't fluid in there just be "sucked out" medically?

If the fluid is preventing breathing or causing other damage, why can't we medically just remove the fluid? Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There are several reasons:
- the exudate collects in alveoli and bronchioli, which are extremely small structures. Getting a suction tube into an alveolus would be practically impossible
- even if you managed that, there are hundreds of thousands of alveoli to suction
- if you simply try to apply negative pressure to the bronchi to suction out the viscous fluid, this would collapse the alveoli, and cause bleeding into the alveoli through the extremely small membrane separating the cavity from the blood vessels (that extremely thin wall is what facilitates the gas exchange)
- If the alveoli collapse, and their walls stick together, it requires a lot of pressure to re-open them (If you wet a balloon, and let the inside walls stick together, then you need to apply a lot of pressure to unstick those walls to blow up the balloon again)

So the current treatment is based on either continuous, or bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation. This means, the ventilator keeps a certain air pressure in the lungs even when exhaling, to ensure that the exhudate-filled alveoli don't collapse and stick together during exhalation.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, davenn, phinds and 12 others
Suctioning of the airways is done for all ventilated patients. It removes the mucus build up from the endotracheal tube, but it doesn't remove any fluid from the lungs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog, pinball1970 and atyy
The article's description makes it seem that some of the mucus is secreted from the lungs. Is that incorrect? What is the source of secretions that build up in the endotracheal tube?
 
@Runesmith @atyy Please do not forget citations when you make declarations of facts you know. It helps all of us. Good thread. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
atyy said:
The article's description makes it seem that some of the mucus is secreted from the lungs. Is that incorrect? What is the source of secretions that build up in the endotracheal tube?

The mucus that accumulates in the ET tube is secreted by goblet cells in the bronchial epithelium, and pushed upwards towards the larynx by actively waving hair-like projections on epithelial cells, called celia. This secretion is natural, and is a defense against pathogens and particulate material that get deposited on the bronchial walls. As the ET tube has no celia, the secretions accumulate there, and can cause occlusion of the tube, aspiration, and/or infection by opportunistic bacteria. That's the reason why the ET tube needs to be suctioned regularly, and this removes only the naturally occurring secretions, not the exhudate in alveoli.

The suctioning of the ET tube is done with a suction tube with a much smaller diameter than the ET tube itself. So it just sucks out fluid where the tip is pointing to. It never creates a negative pressure inside the lungs. Negative pressure strong enough to suck out fluid would cause massive alveolar damage resulting in hemorrhage in the lungs.

*I am a physician (MD) by training, although I am currently not in practice - I am engaged in biomedical research.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Laroxe, Tom.G and 6 others
Be careful when people say "fluid in the lungs". It may be what has been described. But people also say this when the problem is fluid in the lung tissue (edema); like swelling. This reduces the diffusion of O2 from the alveolar space to the capillaries. The common terms can be confusing.

There have been some indications that this is a problem with severe CoVID-19 cases and explains why they don't do well on ventilators. There is more to lung function than filling them with O2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy, Runesmith and sysprog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 516 ·
18
Replies
516
Views
38K