Why cant gene therapy be used to treat cancer?

In summary, gene therapy is not currently practical for treating cancer because of the many safety concerns that have arisen from past clinical trials. However, this technology has the potential to be very useful in personalized medicine applications.
  • #1
As in there is often a mutation in the eg p53 signalling pathway could the gene not be fixed... Or any other ideas in relation to the original question..
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
In theory, gene therapy could be used to treat cancer. In practice, it is not for a variety of reasons.

1) Gene therapy is currently very crude and primitive. Scientists have yet to develop means of efficiently and site specifically incorporating new genes into specific cells. Current technologies insert new genes into a fraction of the target cells and these new DNA sequences are inserted randomly into the genome. This random insertion can disrupt important genes and (ironically) cause cancer. Gene therapy is currently useful for some genetic diseases, but it is currently only practical in cases where the disease being treated is worse than cancer, the possible side effect of gene therapy (one example of such a disease is bubble boy syndrome. Unfortunately, because of the deaths of one of the participants in a gene therapy trial, I believe clinical trials involving gene therapy were suspended due to safety concerns [I'm not sure if this is still the case]).

2) Cancer is not caused by one single mutation. Cancer is the effect of many different mutations combining to cause the disease. Fixing multiple genes is much more difficult than fixing just one gene.

3) Cancer is not one disease. That is, every cancer is caused by a different set of mutations in each individual. One patient may have one type of mutation in p53 that inactivates it. It is possible that adding active p53 back into this individual via gene therapy could cure his cancer. However, if another patient has a dominant negative mutation of p53 or a mutation in a protein that regulates p53, it is likely that the same approach would fail to cure the cancer. Thus, a prerequisite for gene therapy is personalized medicine: a cheap, fast approach for profiling an individual's cancer genome to identify the specific mutations causing the cancer. Personalized medicine would allow doctors to devise the correct strategy for the gene therapy treatments, without which gene therapy would be ineffective. Unfortunately, DNA sequencing technologies remain too expensive for personalized medicine applications.

4) Not all cancer mutations are fully understood. Even if we could cheaply and quickly sequence a cancer genome and identify the mutations, we would, in some cases, not know what the most effective treatment would be.

Therefore much more fundamental and applied research must be done in these fields before gene therapy can become a viable option for cancer treatment.
  • #3
Genetic therapy (to treat many diseases, not just cancer) has been a failure to date due to Ygggdrasil's point #1.

1. Why can't gene therapy be used as the sole treatment for cancer?

While gene therapy has shown promise in treating certain types of cancer, it is not currently advanced enough to be used as the sole treatment for all forms of cancer. Cancer is a complex disease with many different causes and mechanisms, and gene therapy is still in its early stages of development. It is most effective when used in combination with other treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

2. What are the limitations of using gene therapy to treat cancer?

One major limitation of gene therapy for cancer is the difficulty of targeting specific cancer cells without affecting healthy cells. Gene therapy also faces challenges with delivering the therapeutic genes to the right cells and ensuring they are expressed at the correct levels. Additionally, the immune system may reject the modified cells, limiting the effectiveness of the treatment.

3. Can gene therapy cure cancer?

Gene therapy is not a cure for cancer, but rather a potential treatment option. It works by targeting and modifying specific genes that are involved in the development or progression of cancer. It may be able to slow or stop the growth of cancer cells, but it cannot completely eradicate all cancer cells from the body.

4. How is gene therapy different from traditional cancer treatments?

Traditional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy work by targeting and killing rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells. Gene therapy, on the other hand, aims to modify the genetic material of the cancer cells to either kill them or prevent them from growing and spreading. It is a more targeted approach that may have fewer side effects than traditional treatments.

5. Are there any risks associated with using gene therapy for cancer?

As with any medical treatment, there are potential risks associated with using gene therapy for cancer. These may include an immune response to the modified cells, unintended changes to other genes, and the potential for the therapy to not work as intended. However, researchers are continually working to refine and improve gene therapy techniques to minimize these risks.

Suggested for: Why cant gene therapy be used to treat cancer?