Why Can't Space Ships Use Propellers or Jets for Manoeuvrability?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jsea-7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ships Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using propellers or conventional airplane jets for maneuverability in space, addressing the challenges posed by the vacuum of space and the presence of sparse cosmic materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that space is a vacuum, which makes the use of propellers or jets impractical due to the lack of air.
  • Others acknowledge that while space contains cosmic dust and hydrogen and helium atoms, the density is so low that it does not support the functionality of propellers or jets.
  • One participant suggests that the tiny dust particles in space could damage propellers, leading to erosion over time due to high-speed impacts.
  • A participant questions how exactly a propeller would be damaged, prompting a response that objects in orbit experience erosion from particle collisions.
  • Another viewpoint discusses the concept of mean free paths in space, explaining that the sparse distribution of particles means they do not exert significant pressure, making traditional propulsion methods ineffective.
  • One participant proposes the idea of a space vehicle utilizing electromagnetic wings to interact with space plasma, likening it to how gliders use thermals for lift.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the vacuum of space presents significant challenges for using propellers or jets, but multiple competing views exist regarding the implications of cosmic dust and alternative propulsion methods.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the density and impact of cosmic materials, as well as the feasibility of proposed alternative propulsion systems like electromagnetic wings.

jsea-7
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The question is why space ships cannot use propellers or conventional airplane jets to move in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is no air for them to use. Space is a vacuum.
 
Stratosphere said:
There is no air for them to use. Space is a vacuum.

I presumed that. But I also thought that space contained cosmic dust and hydrogen and hellium atoms, therefore it can't be a total vacuum.
 
You would of course be correct, but such a dust is so tenuous that any propeller type design would be extraordinarily un-feasible. That is why for practical purposes relating to aircraft and spacecraft design, space is considered a vacuum.
 
just imagine those tiny dust particles as micro meteors. Any propellar would be ripped to shreads. Also, there is no where near enough hydrogen or dust to use a propellar let alone a jet engine.
 
ecao said:
just imagine those tiny dust particles as micro meteors. Any propellar would be ripped to shreads. Also, there is no where near enough hydrogen or dust to use a propellar let alone a jet engine.

How exactly would a propeller be ripped to shreads?
 
I don't think it would exactly be ripped to shreds, but objects we put in orbit get damaged - essentially eroded away - over time due to the speed of the particles hitting them.
 
jsea-7 said:
I presumed that. But I also thought that space contained cosmic dust and hydrogen and hellium atoms, therefore it can't be a total vacuum.

Propellers and jets work because the gas (usually air) they encounter is dense enough to have very small mean-free-paths - thus the particles of gas collide with each other within a short distance and can be relied on to behave like a thin "liquid" in which pressure differences are significant.

In space the mean free path between collisions is thousands of kilometres typically, thus particles pass each other easily and essentially exert no pressure. Of course if you could collect the gas from a huge volume in front of you and apply energy to it to expel as a jet, then it would work. That's how a Bussard ramjet works BUT the volumes and energies required are much, much larger than for regular propellers and jets.

Is there the equivalent of a space plane? There might be. A vehicle might be given immense electromagnetic wings that interact with the thin space-plasma and "ride" the currents that fill space, much like a glider can ride thermals and use dynamic soaring to reach high speeds. The wings would need to be very large and probably supported dynamically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K