1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why can't we use cons of energy in this problem? (conceptual)

  1. Feb 19, 2012 #1
    Two pucks collide on a frictionless air-hockey table. Initally, puck A is traveling at 3.5 mls and puck B is at rest. After the collision, puck A moves away at a speed of 2.5 m/s and an angle of 30.0 from the initial direction. Find the final velocity of puck B. Puck A has a mass of 3.0 kg and puck B has a mass of 5.0 kg.

    I know how to do the problem, but we can't we apply the conservation of energy methods because it is an elastic collision?
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 19, 2012 #2

    Pengwuino

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    In inelastic collisions you can't use conservation of energy.
     
  4. Feb 19, 2012 #3
    He says that it is an elastic collision.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Why can't we use cons of energy in this problem? (conceptual)
Loading...