The discussion centers around the effects of Coriolis acceleration on a particle projected vertically upward, specifically questioning why the particle does not land back at the original projection point when only gravity and Coriolis effects are considered.
The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on the Coriolis effect and its implications. Some have suggested practical experiments to observe the effects, while others are analyzing the underlying physics concepts.
There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions regarding the symmetry of forces involved and the conditions under which the Coriolis effect is analyzed. Participants are considering the implications of performing experiments in different environments.
I don't see how that explains the lack of symmetry in the ascent and the descent.pam said:It's easiest to understand using angular momentum.
To keep angular momentum constant, the angular velocity has to decrease as the altitude
increases.
That is a different effect.TVP45 said:This is very sensible if you can manage to try it. Do you live somewhere where you can get on a rotating platform (a Merry-go-round) or one of those kid's spinners at the playground (if it's not covered by snow). In a pinch find a rotating stool which is fastened to the floor. Get a tennis ball. While spinning, toss it in the air. Watch what happens going up. Watch what happens coming down.