Why did Author Use Cosine/Sine for Periodic Sound Waves?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the author's choice of using cosine for the displacement function \(s(x,t) = s_{max}cos(kx-wt)\) and sine for the pressure variation \(\Delta P = \Delta P_{max}sin(kx-wt)\) in the context of periodic sound waves. The key distinction lies in the phase offset of 90 degrees between sine and cosine functions. The author likely chose cosine for the displacement to facilitate deriving the sine function for pressure, aligning with the conventions established in previous chapters regarding traveling waves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and wave functions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Knowledge of sound wave properties, particularly longitudinal waves
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations from harmonic motion principles
  • Learn about phase shifts in wave functions and their implications
  • Explore the relationship between displacement and pressure in sound waves
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of longitudinal waves in different media
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, educators teaching sound wave properties, and anyone interested in the mathematical representation of periodic phenomena.

jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I am confused with why the author uses this form for periodic sound waves.

If s(x,t) is the position of a small element relative to is equilibrium position, we can express this harmonic position function as \[s(x,t) = s_{max}cos(kx-wt)\]

Why did he use cosine instead?
Later, he states

The variation in the gas pressure \Delta P\] measured from the equilibrium value is also periodic. For the position function desribed above (in this thread), \Delta P\] is given by

\[\Delta P = \Delta P_{max}sin(kx-wt)\]

Note he uses sin this time.

I know that the difference between sine and cosine is the phase offset, by 90 degrees.

But why did the author uses cosine for the first equation, and use sine in the second?

There must be a reason for this. He has been consistent with sin convention with traveling waves (previous chapter).

---edited----

For the second equation I understood now that it was derived using the first equation, and thus taking the partial s / partial x we get sine instead. So why did he use cos in the beginning, anyway?

I also understand that sound waves is longitudinal wave.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a little confusing, but it really doesn't matter whether you use sine or cosine - just a matter of where on the wave you choose x=0 and t=0. Perhaps the author wanted to end up with sine for the pressure wave so he started with cosine for the displacement to achieve that end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K