Why Didn't Taking the Second Derivative Solve the Angular Acceleration Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to angular acceleration and the use of derivatives in physics. Participants are exploring the relationship between angular velocity, tangential acceleration, and total linear acceleration, particularly in the context of circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the attempt to derive angular acceleration through the second derivative and question the completeness of considering only tangential acceleration. There is a focus on understanding the components of total linear acceleration, including the potential need to account for centripetal acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the necessity of including both tangential and centripetal acceleration in the calculation of total linear acceleration. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly combine these components, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the distinction between tangential and centripetal acceleration, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the total linear acceleration concept. The original poster's approach and assumptions are being critically examined.

Garen
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


35klkrc.jpg




The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I could take the second derivative and get the angular acceleration from which I could use
16b8cfa99b346f088634c4ef6c1150d0.png
where ω is the angular velocity,
023d6d214986966742c67e809c7ee176.png
is the linear tangential acceleration, and r is the radius of curvature. But for some reason, it didn't give me the right answer, anyone know where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Garen,

Garen said:

Homework Statement


35klkrc.jpg




The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I could take the second derivative and get the angular acceleration from which I could use
16b8cfa99b346f088634c4ef6c1150d0.png
where ω is the angular velocity,
023d6d214986966742c67e809c7ee176.png
is the linear tangential acceleration, and r is the radius of curvature. But for some reason, it didn't give me the right answer, anyone know where I went wrong?

Are you saying that you put in the tangential acceleration as your answer? If so, remember that they are asking for the total linear acceleration, and there is more to the total acceleration than just the tangential part.
 
aaaah thank you so much. i was totally stalking this post and you replied to it in a MOMENT OF PARADISE!
 
alphysicist said:
Hi Garen,



Are you saying that you put in the tangential acceleration as your answer? If so, remember that they are asking for the total linear acceleration, and there is more to the total acceleration than just the tangential part.

Oh, I thought that total linear acceleration was only the tangential acceleration...Would I have to include centripetal acceleration? If so, how?
 
Garen said:
Oh, I thought that total linear acceleration was only the tangential acceleration...Would I have to include centripetal acceleration? If so, how?

What is the formula for centripetal acceleration? (And remember that you have already found the angular velocity!)

Once you have found both components (the tangential and centripetal), the total is just the vector sum.
 
alphysicist said:
What is the formula for centripetal acceleration? (And remember that you have already found the angular velocity!)

Once you have found both components (the tangential and centripetal), the total is just the vector sum.

I got it! Thanks a lot for your help.
 
Garen said:
I got it! Thanks a lot for your help.

Sure, glad to help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K