Incorrect derivation of tangential acceleration in polar coordinates

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
N/A
Relevant Equations
N/A
I am trying to derive the tangential acceleration of a particle. We have tangential velocity, radius and angular velocity. $$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$ and $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + \dot \theta \dot r$$ However, we also have $$\vec{a} = (\ddot r - r \dot \theta^2)\hat{r} + (r \ddot \theta + 2 \dot r \dot \theta)\hat{\theta}$$, which implies $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + 2 \dot \theta \dot r$$

Now, what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yucheng said:
$$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
 
PeroK said:
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
Hmmmm... Is there any way to make it hold when unit vectors change position? By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
 
yucheng said:
By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
 
PeroK said:
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
Oops... ahahaha