Incorrect derivation of tangential acceleration in polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of tangential acceleration in polar coordinates, focusing on the relationship between tangential velocity, angular velocity, and radius. Participants are examining the implications of their mathematical derivations and the conditions under which certain equations hold true.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of tangential acceleration and question the validity of the relationship between tangential acceleration and the time derivative of tangential velocity. There is a focus on the role of changing unit vectors in polar coordinates and whether the established equations can be reconciled under those conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the assumptions made in the derivation and the implications of their findings. Some have pointed out discrepancies in the equations, while others are seeking clarification on the underlying mathematics and its consequences.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexities introduced by the changing unit vectors in polar coordinates, which may affect the validity of their derivations. There is an acknowledgment of the mathematical intricacies involved in the problem.

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
N/A
Relevant Equations
N/A
I am trying to derive the tangential acceleration of a particle. We have tangential velocity, radius and angular velocity. $$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$ and $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + \dot \theta \dot r$$ However, we also have $$\vec{a} = (\ddot r - r \dot \theta^2)\hat{r} + (r \ddot \theta + 2 \dot r \dot \theta)\hat{\theta}$$, which implies $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + 2 \dot \theta \dot r$$

Now, what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yucheng said:
$$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
 
PeroK said:
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
Hmmmm... Is there any way to make it hold when unit vectors change position? By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
 
yucheng said:
By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: yucheng
PeroK said:
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
Oops... ahahaha
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K