Incorrect derivation of tangential acceleration in polar coordinates

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
N/A
Relevant Equations
N/A
I am trying to derive the tangential acceleration of a particle. We have tangential velocity, radius and angular velocity. $$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$ and $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + \dot \theta \dot r$$ However, we also have $$\vec{a} = (\ddot r - r \dot \theta^2)\hat{r} + (r \ddot \theta + 2 \dot r \dot \theta)\hat{\theta}$$, which implies $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r + 2 \dot \theta \dot r$$

Now, what's wrong?
 
on Phys.org
yucheng said:
$$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
 
PeroK said:
You have essentially proved that ##a_T \ne \dot v_T##. The equation does not hold where the unit vectors change with position, hence time.
Hmmmm... Is there any way to make it hold when unit vectors change position? By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
 
yucheng said:
By the way, is there a reason why it does not hold?
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: yucheng
PeroK said:
You've proved it yourself. The mathematics in your original post is the reason.
Oops... ahahaha
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K