Why Do 4s Orbitals Fill Before 3d as Atomic Number Increases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Habeebe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Energy States
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electronic configuration of atoms, specifically why the 4s orbitals fill before the 3d orbitals as atomic number increases. Participants are exploring the energy levels associated with these orbitals and the factors influencing their filling order.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the concepts of penetration and shielding in relation to electron energy levels. There is a discussion on the nature of electrons as standing waves and how this relates to their proximity to the nucleus. Comparisons of radial distributions between 4s and 3d states are suggested, along with inquiries about the effects of angular momentum and the spacing of atomic energy levels as the principal quantum number increases.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants actively engaging with each other's ideas and clarifying concepts. Some have indicated that discussions with instructors have enhanced their understanding, suggesting that helpful guidance has been provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that previous orbitals have been filled, which is a constraint in their exploration of the topic. There is also a noted limitation in their previous discussions being primarily focused on the hydrogen atom, which may affect their understanding of multi-electron systems.

Habeebe
Messages
37
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Explain why, as the atomic number increases, the 4s electronic states fill before the 3d states. The fact that they fill first means they are lower energy. You must explain why they are lower energy.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


First, I'm aware that 4s is not always lower energy than 3d and they are only asking about the case where previous orbitals have been filled.

Everything I've dug up so far has been kinda vague, mentioning things like penetration and shielding. That doesn't sound like a good answer. More specifically, I've seen penetration described as the electron spending more time closer to the nucleus, however, the electron is really a standing wave, so that doesn't make sense to me.

We've only really discussed the Schrödinger Equation for the hydrogen atom, so that doesn't seem applicable here, but any reasonably simple explanation involving it would be very welcome. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Habeebe said:
First, I'm aware that 4s is not always lower energy than 3d and they are only asking about the case where previous orbitals have been filled.
What's special about having the lower states filled?

Everything I've dug up so far has been kinda vague, mentioning things like penetration and shielding. That doesn't sound like a good answer.
Why not?

More specifically, I've seen penetration described as the electron spending more time closer to the nucleus, however, the electron is really a standing wave, so that doesn't make sense to me.
Where did you get the idea that the electron is "really" a standing wave?
It is the wavefunction that forms a stationary state - not the electron. "Spending more time close to the nucleus" means more likely to be detected close to the nucleus than far away from it ...

Compare the radial distribution of the 4s and 3d states.
What is the average distance of the electron from the nucleus in these states?

Have you had a look at what shielding may be doing?

What happens to the spacing of atomic energy levels as you increase n?
What does angular momentum do to each energy level?

We've only really discussed the Schrödinger Equation for the hydrogen atom, so that doesn't seem applicable here, but any reasonably simple explanation involving it would be very welcome.
It is, sort-of, applicable.
The pattern of energy levels for atoms in general is similar to that for hydrogen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I discussed it with my professor, and in conjunction with your replies it makes a lot more sense now. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K