Undergrad Why do eigenvectors stay the same when a matrix is squared?

Click For Summary
Eigenvectors of a matrix A remain the same when A is squared, but this does not imply that A² has the same eigenvectors as A. The discussion clarifies that while squaring the matrix results in eigenvalues being squared, it does not guarantee that the eigenvectors are identical. A counterexample is provided with the derivative operator, where D² has an eigenvector that D does not. The conclusion is that while every eigenvector of A is also an eigenvector of A², A² can have additional eigenvectors that are not present in A. Understanding this distinction is crucial in linear algebra.
Aldnoahz
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I am new to linear algebra but I have been trying to figure out this question. Everybody seems to take for granted that for matrix A which has eigenvectors x, A2 also has the same eigenvectors?

I know that people are just operating on the equation Ax=λx, saying that A2x=A(Ax)=A(λx) and therefore A2x = λ2x. However, in my opinion, this is not a proof proving why A2 and A have the same eigenvectors but rather why λ is squared on the basis that the matrices share the same eigenvectors.

If someone can prove that A2 and A have the same eigenvectors by using equations A2y=αy and Ax=λx, and proceeding to prove y=x, I will be very much convinced that these two matrices have the same eigenvectors.

Or are there any other convincing proofs to show this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already have said everything that can be said here. I don't know why you don't regard it as a proof.
There is no way of proving ##A^2y=\alpha y \; \wedge \; Ax= \lambda x \; \Rightarrow \; x=y## because it is not true.
E.g. ##x## and ##y## can simply be two different (linear independent) eigenvectors of ##A##.

What you can prove is ##Ay=\alpha y \; \Rightarrow \; A^2y=\alpha^2 y## which is done by the equation you posted.
 
Aldnoahz said:
therefore A2x = λ2x.
Let B = A2 and α = λ2. Then Bx = αx. That is the definition of x being an eigenvector of B.
 
Yeah I think I had some problems with my logic. Now I understand. Thank you.
 
i am not sure what you have concluded but it is not true that A^2 has the same eigenvectors as A, since it can have more. E.g. take D the derivative acting on polynomials of degree ≤ one. Then D^2 = 0 and thus has x as an eigenvector, since D^2x = 0, but D does not since Dx = 1. Of course an eigenvector of A is also an eigenvector of A^2, "trivially", as proved above, but the converse is false.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K