Why Do Equivalent Expressions Yield Different Integrals?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gersetaffe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Simplifying
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of equivalent expressions and why different forms yield different integral results. Participants explore the implications of omitting constants of integration and how this affects the perceived equality of the integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why integrating two equivalent expressions results in different integrals, providing specific examples.
  • Another participant points out that both results are incorrect due to the omission of integration constants, suggesting that including these constants would show the results are equivalent.
  • A third participant reinforces the importance of including constants in integration, explaining how the two integrals can be seen as equal when the constants are accounted for.
  • A later reply acknowledges the advice from previous participants about remembering constants, indicating a personal reflection on the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is a general agreement on the importance of including constants of integration, but the initial confusion about the equivalence of the integrals remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the inclusion of constants in integration, which is a critical aspect that was initially overlooked by the first participant.

gersetaffe
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Wanted to know if anyone could explain why if you simplify an expression into a different equivalent form, the integrations are different depending on which form you use.

For example:
\frac{1}{\frac{5x}{7}+3} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{7}(x+4.2)}

\int\frac{1}{\frac{5x}{7}+3}dx = \frac{7}{5}ln(\frac{5x}{7}+3)
while
\int\frac{1}{\frac{5}{7}(x+4.2)}dx = \frac{7}{5}ln(x+4.2)

The two integrations are not equal despite having integrated two equivalent expressions. The issue is if I had to integrate \frac{1}{\frac{5x}{7}+3} I would simplify it to
\frac{1}{\frac{5}{7}(x+4.2)} which gives a different integration than the original expression.

Thanks for any input
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the given example, both results are false because the constants have been forgotten.
If the constants C1 for the first integral and C2 for the second integral were presents, both results are exact and identical.
(7/5)*ln((5/7)x+3) +C1 = (7/5)*ln(x+4.2) + C2
C2 = (7/5)*ln(5/7) +C1
 
Hi gersetaffe! :smile:

You shouldn't forget the constants when integrating! Thus

\int\frac{1}{\frac{5}{7}x+3}dx=\frac{7}{5}ln(\frac{5}{7}x+3)+C

and

\int \frac{1}{\frac{5}{7}(x+4.2)}dx=\frac{7}{5}ln(x+4.2)+C'

these two solutions are the same because the integration constants are different:

\frac{7}{5}ln(\frac{5}{7}x+3)=\frac{7}{5}ln(5/7)+\frac{7}{5}ln(x+4.2)

Thus you see that the two solutions are equal up to a contant, namely, the constant \frac{7}{5}ln(5/7).

So

\frac{7}{5}ln(\frac{5}{7}x+3)+C=\frac{7}{5}ln(x+4.2)+C'

with C'=C+\frac{7}{5}ln(5/7).
 
My high school calculus teacher always told us to remember the constants. Should have listened haha ... thanks JJacquelin and micromass
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K