Why Do Euler's Equalities Hold True?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter coki2000
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mathematical equalities involving infinite series, specifically the alternating series (1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...) and the series of reciprocals of squares (1/1^2 + 1/2^2 + 1/3^2 ...). Participants seek to understand the reasoning behind these equalities and the validity of the methods used to derive them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of treating the first series as a geometric series, noting that the formula is only valid for |r| < 1 and that the sequence of partial sums does not converge.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Euler's approach to these series was unconventional and suggests that his methods, while yielding useful results, may not adhere to standard definitions of convergence.
  • There is a request for clarification on why the average of the partial sums is taken in the context of the first series.
  • A participant asks for the solution to the second equality, indicating a desire for further explanation on the series summing to π²/6.
  • A link to an external resource on the Basel problem is provided for additional context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the methods used to derive the equalities, particularly regarding the first series. There is no consensus on the appropriateness of Euler's techniques or the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the definitions and assumptions surrounding the convergence of infinite series, particularly in the case of the first series. The discussion remains open regarding the interpretation of these mathematical concepts.

coki2000
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Can you explain to me why

(1-1+1-1...)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n=\frac{1}{2}

and

(\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3^2}...)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}=\frac{\pi ^2}{6}

I don't understand these equalities.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first is being treated as a geometric series:
\sum_{n=0}^1 r^n= \frac{1}{1-r}
Taking r= -1 gives 1/(1-(-1))= 1/2.

Of course, that formula is really only valid for |r|< 1. And by the normal definition of "sum of an infinite series", limit of partial sums, the sequence of partial sums is 1, 0, 1, 0, ... which doesn't converge. So that's strectching a point, at least.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The first is being treated as a geometric series:
\sum_{n=0}^1 r^n= \frac{1}{1-r}
Taking r= -1 gives 1/(1-(-1))= 1/2.

Of course, that formula is really only valid for |r|< 1.
But why do we use this formula because this is wrong for r=-1.And why do you take the average of the partial sums(1,0,1...).Thanks for your helps.
 
coki2000 said:
But why do we use this formula because this is wrong for r=-1.And why do you take the average of the partial sums(1,0,1...).Thanks for your helps.
Because Euler decided to do it! As I said, that is NOT a valid calculation using normal definitions. Euler was famous for "playing fast and loose" with sequences and series- and getting useful, if not "correct" results.
 
Okey.Thanks.
What is the solution of second equality?

(\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3^2}...)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}=\frac{\pi ^2}{6}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K