Why do Gaussian Surfaces work?

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the electric field due to an infinite conducting plane with a uniform surface charge density is constant and does not depend on the distance from the plane. This is because the infinite nature of the plane allows for a uniform field, unlike finite planes where the field strength diminishes with distance. While the approximation of an infinite plane is useful for practical calculations, it is important to recognize its limitations, as the field will eventually decrease and behave like that of a point charge at greater distances. The key takeaway is that the infinite plane model is valid only within a certain range where it remains a good approximation. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying Gauss's law in electrostatics.
JustStudying
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I was doing a problem:

An infinite conducting plane has a uniform surface charge density of 30 μC m‾².
Find the electric field strength 7.0 mm from the plane.

so we can use a gaussian surface (e.g a cylinder), and come to the conclusion that E = 30 μ / ε

but that got me thinking, doesn't the electric field strength depend on distance?

I understand that the electric field within the gaussian surface is 0, and that only the top of the gaussian surface we used (cylinder) would have flux passing through it.

But from my working, wouldn't this mean if we were finding the electric field strength at any distance from the conducting plane e.g 100 metres away , E would still be the same?

How does that even work?

Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right, the electric field due to an INFINITE plane with constant charge distribution is a constant field that does not depend on the distance to the plane.
 
Last edited:
The key word here is "infinite", of course. There's no such thing as a truly infinite plane of charge. Even for a very very large plane, you can eventually get far enough away from it that the field it produces does fall off with distance. In fact, eventually you get far enough away that the plane "looks like" a point for all practical purposes, and from that distance outward the field falls off like 1/r2 just like for a point charge.

Nevertheless, the concept of an infinite plane is a useful approximation when you are "close enough" to a "large enough" plane of charge. You just have to be careful not to use the approximation outside the region where it is "good enough" for your purposes.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
698
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K