I Why Do Nebulae only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtons Apple
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Nebulae primarily emit light from Hydrogen (H), Sulfur (S), and Oxygen (O) due to their abundance and the specific emission lines produced when these elements are excited by radiation from nearby stars. Most nebulae consist of about 90% hydrogen, with sulfur and oxygen making up the remaining 10%, which explains why these elements are most commonly discussed in astrophotography. The continuous spectrum of nebulae indicates that they are vast regions of dust and gas, not just remnants of stars. Planetary nebulae, originating from dissipated red giants rather than supernovae, have a limited variety of elements compared to other types of nebulae. The visibility of emission lines also plays a crucial role in the focus on H, S, and O in discussions about nebulae.
Newtons Apple
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Why Do Nebula only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?
So I love talking about space but I also hate rattling off misleading or wrong info...I'm trying to wrap my head around why the nebula we observe, only emit Hydrogen (of the alpha variety) Sulfur II and Oxygen III? Why these specific elements only? I do some astrophotography so these are the three color palette types that the RGB revolves around... but If the nebula is a planetary nebula, should it be an absolute cocktail of all of the elements that the star fused in the past? Or actually maybe just the last elements it was fusing? If a star burned through it's hydrogen supply millions of years ago, and is now fusing iron before it pops, why do the nebula then have the H, S and O ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Newtons Apple said:
I'm trying to wrap my head around why the nebula we observe, only emit Hydrogen (of the alpha variety) Sulfur II and Oxygen III? Why these specific elements only?
That is hard to believe. Where does that restrictive H, S, & O emission analysis come from, a reference please?

Nebulae tend to have a continuous spectrum. Nebulae come in many forms. Most nebulae are not stars, they are vast star forming regions of dust and gas.
 
Baluncore said:
That is hard to believe. Where does that restrictive H, S, & O emission analysis come from, a reference please?

Nebulae tend to have a continuous spectrum. Nebulae come in many forms. Most nebulae are not stars, they are vast star forming regions of dust and gas.
So as I was waiting for a response I may be able to answer this myself... but let me run it by you and everyone... So I do a lot of astrophotography and we use filters to cut out a lot of the other light and only allow very specific bands from the spectrum to hit the camera. the issue is that whenever they discuss them, they ONLY discuss Oxygen, Sulfur and Hydrogen as if that's the only elements present. What I'm thinking is maybe those are the only ones that emit light when excited by the radiation from nearby stars?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, WWGD and russ_watters
Google('s"AI") tells me only about 10% of a star's hydrogen is fused in the main sequence. So, most other elements are pretty scarce. That doesn't beg the question though about why He isn't used much if at all. It probably has to do with the visibility of the emissions lines/spectrum.


Also note that planetary nubulae are from dissipated red giant, not supernova, so they dont get as much or wide variety of other elements.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top