Why Do Nebulae only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtons Apple
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the emission spectra of nebulae, specifically why they predominantly exhibit emissions from Hydrogen (alpha), Sulfur II, and Oxygen III. Participants explore the implications of these emissions in relation to the elements present in nebulae, particularly in the context of astrophotography and the fusion processes of stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why nebulae primarily emit Hydrogen, Sulfur, and Oxygen, questioning if other elements should also be present based on stellar fusion history.
  • Another participant challenges the claim of restricted emissions, asking for references and noting that nebulae have a continuous spectrum and come in various forms.
  • A participant suggests that the focus on H, S, and O in astrophotography may be due to these elements being the most visible when excited by radiation from nearby stars.
  • One participant cites a search indicating that most nebulae are approximately 90% Hydrogen, with Sulfur and Oxygen making up most of the remaining 10%, leading to their prominence in emission lines.
  • Another participant mentions that only about 10% of a star's Hydrogen is fused during the main sequence and questions the lack of Helium emissions, attributing it to visibility issues in the spectrum.
  • A clarification is made that planetary nebulae originate from dissipated red giants rather than supernovae, which may limit the variety of elements present.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the prominence of H, S, and O emissions in nebulae. While some propose explanations related to the visibility of these elements, others question the completeness of this perspective, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations in understanding the emission spectra, including the potential scarcity of other elements and the dependence on the excitation conditions in nebulae.

Newtons Apple
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Why Do Nebula only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?
So I love talking about space but I also hate rattling off misleading or wrong info...I'm trying to wrap my head around why the nebula we observe, only emit Hydrogen (of the alpha variety) Sulfur II and Oxygen III? Why these specific elements only? I do some astrophotography so these are the three color palette types that the RGB revolves around... but If the nebula is a planetary nebula, should it be an absolute cocktail of all of the elements that the star fused in the past? Or actually maybe just the last elements it was fusing? If a star burned through it's hydrogen supply millions of years ago, and is now fusing iron before it pops, why do the nebula then have the H, S and O ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Newtons Apple said:
I'm trying to wrap my head around why the nebula we observe, only emit Hydrogen (of the alpha variety) Sulfur II and Oxygen III? Why these specific elements only?
That is hard to believe. Where does that restrictive H, S, & O emission analysis come from, a reference please?

Nebulae tend to have a continuous spectrum. Nebulae come in many forms. Most nebulae are not stars, they are vast star forming regions of dust and gas.
 
Baluncore said:
That is hard to believe. Where does that restrictive H, S, & O emission analysis come from, a reference please?

Nebulae tend to have a continuous spectrum. Nebulae come in many forms. Most nebulae are not stars, they are vast star forming regions of dust and gas.
So as I was waiting for a response I may be able to answer this myself... but let me run it by you and everyone... So I do a lot of astrophotography and we use filters to cut out a lot of the other light and only allow very specific bands from the spectrum to hit the camera. the issue is that whenever they discuss them, they ONLY discuss Oxygen, Sulfur and Hydrogen as if that's the only elements present. What I'm thinking is maybe those are the only ones that emit light when excited by the radiation from nearby stars?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, WWGD and russ_watters
Google('s"AI") tells me only about 10% of a star's hydrogen is fused in the main sequence. So, most other elements are pretty scarce. That doesn't beg the question though about why He isn't used much if at all. It probably has to do with the visibility of the emissions lines/spectrum.


Also note that planetary nubulae are from dissipated red giant, not supernova, so they dont get as much or wide variety of other elements.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K