Why do nuclear mass tables usually start with ...?

  • I
  • Thread starter alizade
  • Start date
  • Tags
    nuclear mass
  • #1
alizade

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,180
8,299
They don't. One example does not mean "usually".
 
  • #3
alizade
They don't. One example does not mean "usually".
I have read about 10 such articles.
 
  • #4
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,180
8,299
You're posting nonsense.

In this very thread, you linked to a set of tables that started at A=1.
 
  • #5
alizade
You're posting nonsense.

In this very thread, you linked to a set of tables that started at A=1.

I did not say that it never starts with Z=1.

My question is why in many articles starting at Z&N= 8
 
  • #6
13,475
10,529
I have read about 10 such articles.
Still not usual. The lists I use to use contain all elements. So in certain cases, it might make no sense to talk about light elements, or it's due to layout reasons, whatsoever. The fact, that you ask, makes me think, you suggest some underlying, hidden meaning. There is none. If someone created a list which starts with oxygen, so it's this someone whom you should ask. Otherwise it's simply guesswork about the author's intentions.

The answer to your question is: human pattern recognition, no correlation to chemistry or physics.
Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Related Threads on Why do nuclear mass tables usually start with ...?

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
742
Replies
9
Views
23K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top