Why Do Objects Bounce? Exploring Momentum and Energy Conservation

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dark85
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the reasons why objects bounce upon impact with a surface, focusing on the principles of momentum and energy conservation. Participants examine theoretical scenarios involving mass, height, and the effects of collisions, considering both idealized conditions and real-world implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario where a mass m is held at height h and argues that momentum is conserved in the absence of external forces, leading to the conclusion that an object can only bounce back to the same height for energy and momentum to be conserved.
  • Another participant questions the initial conditions, stating that the momentum of the object is not conserved due to the external force of gravity acting on it as it falls.
  • A different participant critiques the use of an infinitely massive surface, suggesting that the momentum equation presented is incorrect and that a finite mass should be considered for accurate calculations.
  • One participant acknowledges their mistakes and expresses a desire to understand the concepts better, indicating an ongoing learning process.
  • Another participant emphasizes that bouncing back at the same speed but in the opposite direction does not conserve the momentum of the ball, introducing a vectorial perspective on momentum.
  • Several participants summarize the argument that objects must deform upon impact, storing elastic potential energy, which is then converted back into kinetic energy, highlighting the importance of deformation in the bouncing process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the conservation of momentum and energy during collisions, with no consensus reached on the correctness of the initial arguments or the implications of deformation and energy transfer.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the mass of the surface, the idealization of perfectly elastic collisions, and the neglect of energy dissipation during impacts. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of these concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of physics, particularly those interested in mechanics, energy conservation, and the dynamics of collisions.

Dark85
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Proof of why objects bounce using conservation of momentum and energy
Consider a body of mass m held above a rigid surface at a height h. Let the surface have such a large mass that any force exerted by the body during this entire scenario practically does not move the surface. This implies that before the body hits the surface and after hitting it, the momentum of the surface is zero throughout. Let the body, after hitting the surface, attain a final momentum of mv Since the body is initially held at rest, it's initial momentum is zero. Since there is no external force on the body-surface system, momentum is conserved i.e. :
initial momentum = final momentum
mu + 0 = mv + 0
0 = mv
v = 0 m s-1
This implies the final possible state can be at rest on the surface or at rest after bouncing to any height, including the initial height h(We assume there is no dissipation of energy as heat or sound)

But if it is at rest on the surface, it implies kinetic energy is 0 J. Since we assumed that no energy is dissipated, it implies energy is not conserved hence this final state is not possible. It is the same for all other states where the ball bounces to a smaller height because in this case also energy is not conserved as the kinetic the initial energy mgh is not equal to the final energy mg*(a height smaller than h). Only if the ball bounces back to the same height h is when momentum and energy is conserved. Hence, this why an object bounces rather than just hitting the surface and staying at rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What causes the mass above the surface to start moving as soon as it's released from rest?
What does Newton's third law have to say about this?
The momentum of the object alone is not conserved because the external force of gravity acts on it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dark85
This is nice work. It is clear that you are thinking mathematically. Using infinite mass objects requires some care:

Dark85 said:
This implies that before the body hits the surface and after hitting it, the momentum of the surface is zero throughout.
Not really. It implies that the velocity is infinitesimal. But an infinitely massive object can have any finite momentum with an infinitesimal velocity.

Dark85 said:
initial momentum = final momentum
mu + 0 = mv + 0
Because of the above, this equation is not correct. The rest of the argument falls apart here.

In general, when trying to correctly use the idea of an infinitely massive or massless object, the correct procedure is to assume that it has a finite non-negligible mass, do the calculations with that mass, and then take the limit as the mass goes to the relevant extreme.

In this case, if we let the surface have a large mass ##M##, and take the inertial frame to be the one where ##M## is initially at rest, then conservation of momentum gives us $$m\ u_m+0=M \ v_M + m\ v_m$$ and conservation of KE gives us $$\frac{1}{2}m\ u_m^2+0=\frac{1}{2}M \ v_M^2 + \frac{1}{2}m\ v_m^2$$ which can be jointly solved to obtain $$v_m=\frac{m\ u_m-M\ u_m}{m+M}$$$$v_M=\frac{2 m\ u_m}{m+M}$$

Now, at this point we can take the limits as ##M## goes to infinity to get ##v_m=-u_m## and ##v_M=0##. Importantly, ##v_m\ne 0##. Note also, that in this same limit, the momentum of ##M## goes to ##M\ v_M=2 m\ u_m## and its KE goes to ##\frac{1}{2} M \ v_M^2 = 0##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, phinds and Dark85
Thank you for pointing out my mistakes sir. I will redo it once more till i get a clear understanding. Once again, thank you.
 
Dark85 said:
Only if the ball bounces back to the same height h is when momentum and energy is conserved. Hence, this why an object bounces rather than just hitting the surface and staying at rest.
Momentum is a vector that has magnitude and direction. Bouncing back at the same speed but opposite direction does not conserve the momentum of the ball.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Dark85
Dark85 said:
TL;DR Summary: Proof of why objects bounce using conservation of momentum and energy

Consider a body of mass m held above a rigid surface at a height h. Let the surface have such a large mass that any force exerted by the body during this entire scenario practically does not move the surface. This implies that before the body hits the surface and after hitting it, the momentum of the surface is zero throughout. Let the body, after hitting the surface, attain a final momentum of mv Since the body is initially held at rest, it's initial momentum is zero. Since there is no external force on the body-surface system, momentum is conserved i.e. :
initial momentum = final momentum
mu + 0 = mv + 0
0 = mv
v = 0 m s-1
This implies the final possible state can be at rest on the surface or at rest after bouncing to any height, including the initial height h(We assume there is no dissipation of energy as heat or sound)

But if it is at rest on the surface, it implies kinetic energy is 0 J. Since we assumed that no energy is dissipated, it implies energy is not conserved hence this final state is not possible. It is the same for all other states where the ball bounces to a smaller height because in this case also energy is not conserved as the kinetic the initial energy mgh is not equal to the final energy mg*(a height smaller than h). Only if the ball bounces back to the same height h is when momentum and energy is conserved. Hence, this why an object bounces rather than just hitting the surface and staying at rest.
Quit simple, it's just compression and release. Conetic energy makes compression, and stored energy is then released.
 
Dark85 said:
TL;DR Summary: Proof of why objects bounce using conservation of momentum and energy

But if it is at rest on the surface, it implies kinetic energy is 0 J. Since we assumed that no energy is dissipated, it implies energy is not conserved hence this final state is not possible.
The objects have to deform on impact. Even if you assume the deformation of the surface is neglbible, the bouncing object must deform on impact, storing easitic potential energy. After the collision that potential energy is converted to kinetic energy.

If you assume no energy is "dissapated", which simpy means no mechanical energy is converted to internal eneg energy, then you have the idalisation called a perfectly elastic collision.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K