# Why do physicists show the magnetic field perpendicular to F

• I
• physics user1
In summary, the magnetic force field is perpendicular to the force because it is created by a moving charge, and the force changes direction with the velocity of the charge. This is due to a cross product between the velocity and the magnetic field, resulting in a perpendicular force. If there were magnetic charges, the force would be in the same direction as the magnetic field, similar to electric charges.
physics user1
I mean physicists when they have to create a field they draw it with the same direction of the force, (gravitational, electric for example) i know that the magnetic field acts only on moving charges and i also know that the force is a relativistic effect of lorentz contraction, but why creating a field and making it perpendicular to a force? why not representing the magnetic field vector perpendicular to the force?

Trying to answer myself, please tell me if i got it or if it's wrong:

so, we are trying to find a vectorial field, we know from experiments that the force created by this field is proportional to the velocity of entry of a charge and to the strenght of the field, the force is a vector. the field is a vector, the velocity is a vector, the only way we can get a vector F from v and B also vectors so that F is proportional to both is by cross product, this implies that the F is perpendicular to B so we make a vectorial field perpendicular to the force. basically we see that the force changes direction with the velocity and that has to be because of another vector acting on the velocity

is this correct?

B is actually called magnetic inductance and I think it's for a good reason.

The electric field at some position will vary with charge variation like this :
dE = dq r / (4πε r3) ,
with "bold" r as position vector.
And the force acting on another particle is written as
F = q E = q1 q2 r / (4πε r3)

From Biot Savart we have
dB = μ I dl x r / (4π r3)
= μ (q/dt) dl x r / (4πr3)
= μ q v x r / (4π r3),
with vectors l, r and v.
So, the magnetic field induction is produced by a charge moving (or a current flow).

The Lorentz force is written as
F = q v x B
which can be detailed further more as
F = q1 v1 x (μ q2 v2 x r / (4π r3))
with r being the distance between q1 and q2.

So inside the Lorentz force we have 2 curls :
- first curl with the affected particle's velocity and the induction
- second curl inside induction, from a charge's movement and the distance from the charge.
v1 x (v2 x r) (PS: curl is not commutative)

So overall force is
(1) F = m a = m dv/dt

(2) F = q E + q v x B
F = q1 q2 r / (4πε r3) + q1 v1 x (μ q2 v2 x r / (4π r3))

From (1) and (2) we get that

m dv1/dt = q1 q2 r / (4πε r3) + q1 v1 x (μ q2 v2 x r / (4π r3))

(To cover relativistic effects one will use : dpα / dτ = q Fαβ Uβ )

Now if there were magnetic charges we would call them g (or magnetic "monopoles").
Dirac developed the theory for magnetic charges (symmetric electromagnetic field theory) and it's like this :

g = ∫∫∫volume ρm dV = ∫∫area B dS

with ρm as magnetic charge density.
( the elementary magnetic charge would be g = ħ/(2eμ) = 2.6 10-10 [Am] )

B = μ g r / (4π r3)

∇ x H = J + ∂D/∂t
∇ x E = -Jm - ∂B/∂t
∇D = ρ
∇B = ρm

And a force acting on another magnetic charge g would be defined as :

F = g B
which is similar to F = q E.

So, between charges of same type - electric vs electric, magnetic vs magnetic -we have "direct" force (no curl), the force has the same direction with the field.
Since magnetic induction is generated by moving charges it acts only on moving charges inflicting same type of "action" (or same kind of "response").

This is the theoretical layer of classical electromagnetism and I might have gotten more deeper than you asked
If there's any mistake i think someone else will cover for it.

PS: one more thing.
(1) Electric field changes and magnetic field changes propagate with the speed of light so F = q v x B will happen when the field (change) arrives at the destination charge (aka [time of arrival] = [distance between charges] / [speed of light] ).
(2) the spin is a charge "moving" or better said "rotating". So the "spinning" of charge will be affected by the magnetic inductance.

physics user1
Cozma Alex said:
I mean physicists when they have to create a field they draw it with the same direction of the force, (gravitational, electric for example) i know that the magnetic field acts only on moving charges and i also know that the force is a relativistic effect of lorentz contraction, but why creating a field and making it perpendicular to a force? why not representing the magnetic field vector perpendicular to the force?

Trying to answer myself, please tell me if i got it or if it's wrong:

so, we are trying to find a vectorial field, we know from experiments that the force created by this field is proportional to the velocity of entry of a charge and to the strenght of the field, the force is a vector. the field is a vector, the velocity is a vector, the only way we can get a vector F from v and B also vectors so that F is proportional to both is by cross product, this implies that the F is perpendicular to B so we make a vectorial field perpendicular to the force. basically we see that the force changes direction with the velocity and that has to be because of another vector acting on the velocity

is this correct?

In which direction should the magnetic force field point? Given that charged particles will move in very different directions depending on the direction of their velocity.

## 1. Why is the magnetic field shown perpendicular to the force?

The magnetic field is shown perpendicular to the force because it is a result of the interaction between moving charged particles and the magnetic field. This interaction, known as the Lorentz force, causes charged particles to experience a force that is perpendicular to both the direction of the magnetic field and their velocity.

## 2. How does the direction of the magnetic field affect the force?

The direction of the magnetic field determines the direction of the force experienced by a charged particle. If the magnetic field and velocity of the particle are parallel, there will be no force. If they are perpendicular, the force will be at a maximum. The angle between the two determines the strength of the force.

## 3. Why is the magnetic field shown as lines instead of arrows?

The magnetic field is often represented by lines because it helps to visualize the direction and strength of the field at different points in space. The density of the lines is proportional to the strength of the field, with more lines indicating a stronger magnetic field.

## 4. How can we visualize a magnetic field that is perpendicular to the force?

One way to visualize a magnetic field that is perpendicular to the force is to use a right-hand rule. If you point your thumb in the direction of the velocity of a charged particle, and your fingers in the direction of the magnetic field, then the force on the particle will be in the direction of your palm.

## 5. Are there any exceptions to the rule of the magnetic field being perpendicular to the force?

While the magnetic field is typically perpendicular to the force, there are some cases where it can be parallel or antiparallel to the force. This occurs when the charged particles are moving along the magnetic field lines, or when the magnetic field is uniform and the particles are moving in a circular path. In these cases, the force will be either zero or at a maximum, depending on the direction of the velocity of the particles.

Replies
4
Views
617
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
894
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
979
Replies
2
Views
948
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
689