Why Do Rocket Hobbyists Use Non-Stoichiometric Mixes in Propellants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adoado
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 3K views
adoado
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
The combination of potassium nitrate and sorbitol and commonly used by hobbyists as a propellant for rocket motors.

The combustion equation is given below:
KNO3.jpg


I have a few very simple questions based on the chemistry of such a reaction.

Firstly, many people do not use stoichiometric quantities of each reagent. Why is this? I thought the idea was to get the 'exact' amounts as to optimize the reaction? Or is this simply optimizing the efficiency of the utilization of the reagents into products?

Secondly, there is an oxygen term there; does this need to be available as a gas? For example, a lot of people seem to add Iron Oxide to this mix, probably to give this oxygen component. My question is, why iron oxide - can anything with an oxygen work?

Thanks for reading,
Adrian
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
adoado said:
The combination of potassium nitrate and sorbitol and commonly used by hobbyists as a propellant for rocket motors.

The combustion equation is given below:
KNO3.jpg


I have a few very simple questions based on the chemistry of such a reaction.

Firstly, many people do not use stoichiometric quantities of each reagent. Why is this? I thought the idea was to get the 'exact' amounts as to optimize the reaction? Or is this simply optimizing the efficiency of the utilization of the reagents into products?

Secondly, there is an oxygen term there; does this need to be available as a gas? For example, a lot of people seem to add Iron Oxide to this mix, probably to give this oxygen component. My question is, why iron oxide - can anything with an oxygen work?

Thanks for reading,
Adrian

Non stoichiometric amounts just means some of the reactants will be left over. This could also shift the equilibrium and get a more complete reaction with respect to other reactants.

Yes, standard combustion uses gaseous oxygen. I'm not sure about the iron oxide chemistry. It may act as a catalyst, or alter the actual reaction mechanism.

I doubt iron oxide is the oxygen source, because that would require a large amount, and require some sort of splitting reaction.