Why Do Sea Levels Change Differently Around the World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gabriel alexander
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the film "Soylent Green" and its perceived prophetic nature regarding societal and environmental issues. Participants highlight themes of overpopulation, pollution, and potential future food shortages, drawing parallels to John Brunner's works, particularly "The Sheep Look Up" and "Stand on Zanzibar." Concerns about climate change are raised, including predictions of sea level rise and its economic implications, with some arguing that current models suggest less drastic changes than those depicted in the film. The conversation also touches on societal structures, comparing the film's dystopian elements to modern realities, such as wealth disparity and the treatment of marginalized groups. While some express skepticism about the accuracy of these predictions, others argue that the film's portrayal of societal decay remains relevant today. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of anxiety about future challenges and a critical examination of past predictions in science fiction.
gabriel alexander
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
In my opinion, the film that predicted our times best is "Soylent Green," and the author who did so was John Brunner, with his The Sheep Look Up and Zanzibar. What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gabriel alexander said:
In my opinion, the film that predicted our times best is "Soylent Green," and the author who did so was John Brunner, with his The Sheep Look Up and Zanzibar. What do you guys think?
I don't think we're eating people yet.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Idiocracy is very realistic. :(
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777, hutchphd, essenmein and 1 other person
GTOM said:
Idiocracy is very realistic. :(
Sadly, we do seem to be headed that way.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
gabriel alexander said:
In my opinion, the film that predicted our times best is "Soylent Green,"

How so, @gabriel alexander?
 
Tghu Verd said:
Well, we have overpopulation, the forrests are going away, soon enough we'll have to eat bugs, pollution is at a gargantuan rate, and, not so long from now, we will sun-bathe in Siberia in January. That's how.
 
gabriel alexander said:
Well, we have overpopulation, the forrests are going away, soon enough we'll have to eat bugs, pollution is at a gargantuan rate, and, not so long from now, we will sun-bathe in Siberia in January. That's how.

It's been a LONG time since I watched Soylent Green, @gabriel alexander, but on that basis, 'yes' you're right! Pretty scary, when you lay it out like that :nb)
 
@gabriel alexander Even if the very worst happens, climate wise, most of the impact you mention will affect people newly born in ~30 years. And the worst first impact will likely be sea level rise in coastal areas. So sunbathing in Siberia will have to wait longer.

However, it is your thread, if hyperbole suits you, go for it. Just do not buy land in Florida to pass on as an investment for your grandkids... :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189 and phinds
jim mcnamara said:
Just do not buy land in Florida to pass on as an investment for your grandkids...

Some models predict enough sea level rise that it's not just Florida, @jim mcnamara. We're miles from the coast, but I have joshed with our neighbors that we're going to be have beachfront properties the way things are going!
 
  • #10
It's hard to give credit for a correct prediction to something that hasn't happened yet.
It's also hard to give credit to "overpopulation", especially leading to starvation and cannibalism when the fraction of people dying of famine has dropped by two orders of magnitude since the film.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Merlin3189, BWV, DEvens and 1 other person
  • #11
FWIW - most models predict 1 - 3 feet sea level rise by 2100. That puts a larger part of Florida underwater - the same is true for all costal plain areas at low elevation. Everywhere. It is just more fun to play the hyperbole game.

If the models are correct, an assumption, then the economic costs in the US will be close to unbearable. A seawall that closes the ocean to all of the coastline, river deltas and bays for the Eastern US would have to extend from Texas to the St Lawrence river. Ain't going to happen. People will bail out - literally - and move.

Economists dealing with the subject of climate change ( read with proper perspective, if possible):
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-...ange-is-hopeless-morning-brief-110537963.html
 
  • #12
Plan B could be: think Venice on a grandiose scale. Raise millions of houses, buildings about 6 feet use boats instead of cars and trucks... but what if sea rise continues? Hmm.
 
  • #13
About a third of the Netherlands is below sea level today, so its not an impossible task to hold back the ocean!
 
  • #14
essenmein said:
About a third of the Netherlands is below sea level today, so its not an impossible task to hold back the ocean!
Uh ... you want to do a comparison of the coastal length in the Netherlands vs the rest of Europe plus America, to say nothing of South America? Dream on.
 
  • #15
Since we talk about flooded cities, is it possible to give the present day street level to the water, and build bridges and roads between skyscrapers and rooftops?

I also think cyberpunk is still rather realistic, we achieved much with cybernetic limbs, and started to develop brain computer interfaces.
 
  • #16
Oh...where to begin?

1, The movie, set two years hence, claims 40 million people in New York and "a heat wave all year long". That hasn't happened yet. It's hard to give Fleischer credit for prophesy based on estimates that things will be less bad in a century than he predicts in two years.

2. I know of no model that predicts 3 feet of sea level change in 80 years. There were extreme ones ~20 years ago that got to 3 feet, but 20 years of those have passed. The IPCC estimates are more like 6 inches by 2100.

3. "Your mileage my vary". I always thought that sea level was sea level, but in fact, different places see different changes. I don't understand this. In the words of Ralph Wiggum, "that's unpossible!" In the US, the Atlantic seems to be more affected than the Pacific, and most of that is in the mid-Atlantic states. Florida has a substantially smaller measured increase. The peninsula you should be worried about is Delamarva.

4. Yes, it is possible to do what GTOM says, and it's already happened a century and a half ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_of_Chicago
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189, GTOM and phinds
  • #17
Considering that the previous century saw round-about 12 inches of sea level rise, I think the expected 12 inches in the 21st century is probably not going to result in mass cannibalism.

Trouble in Florida due to sea level rise is probably as much as 500 years away. Look back 500 years and tell me who lived in Florida. Look forward 500 years and tell me who will live in Florida. Maybe you are borrowing invented trouble.

Considering that there are more forested acres in the USA now than at 1900, and the increase in CO2 is causing the green cover of the planet to increase, maybe we won't need to start eating cock roaches any time soon.

https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/w...-trees-than-there-were-100-years-ago-its-true

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

So the future as shown in _Soylent Green_ would appear to have been averted.

There are challenges, but these are not a problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189 and GTOM
  • #18
Cannibalism: can it be a realistic option on a space mining colony, far from Earth?
 
  • #19
Cannibalism is an inefficient source of protein, whatever you have to feed your human livestock you could just eat yourself. Raising chickens, which is about a 1.6 feed conversion ratio is much more efficient (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed_conversion_ratio) (although I could not find the feed conversion ratio for humans)

Plus, we are a decade or so away from widespread cultured meat and dairy, which will be more efficient than any livestock
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
  • #20
gabriel alexander said:
In my opinion, the film that predicted our times best is "Soylent Green," and the author who did so was John Brunner, with his The Sheep Look Up and Zanzibar. What do you guys think?

Let us consider some of the structural components of the film's society:

Women are 'furniture' with little value beyond sexual partner or companionship.​
'Mixed race' no longer relevant but women are still furniture.​
Police are ubiquitous dressed like common people.​
Everyone dresses alike except the wealthy and furniture.​
Police protect the wealthy and eliminate the poor.​
Science and scientists ("books") serve the police and oligarchs.​
Only the wealthy are citizens with 'rights'. Poor people are fodder.​
The wealthy live long protected lives. The poor are homeless and doomed.​
The remaining religious provide shelter but actually help the police.​
Common employed people disdain women, control the poor, serve the wealthy.​
The model for government is institutional oligarchical fascism.​
How does this compare to modern society?
 
  • #21
The movie "Soylent Green" was based on the novel Make Room! Make Room! by author Harry Harrison. Many characters such as "Shirl" enter the movie intact. Notice the societal similarities to other Harrison stories such as the film "Rollerball" based on short story "Rollerball Murder".

John Brunner's dystopian novel Stand on Zanzibar followed a few years after Harrison's. No doubt both novels influenced later film makers and script writers.
 
  • #22
Klystron said:
How does this compare to modern society?

Are any of these worse today than in 1973? If not, it's hard to call it prophesy.
 
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
Are any of these worse today than in 1973? If not, it's hard to call it prophesy.
Exactly the point. Fans and critics of Brunner expect weighty cerebral Futurism. Harrison fans, despite the dark themes, 'just want to have fun' enjoying a good read. Can critics catch glimpses of Henry Kissinger in E. G. Robinson's portrayal of an old man who knows too much?

Euthanasia was a frequent SF theme in those times; see "Logan's Run" for example or Chip Delany's novella's where young soldiers are randomly zapped in their sleep. Any old man might be somebody's granddad. No prophecy involved. Just a clear eye for society and good writing. Unlike sacred doctrine, SF is written to entertain not provide moral paths into the future.
 
  • #24
Dark rivers of the heart from Dean Koontz seems pretty prophetic sometimes. :(
 
  • #25
Vanadium 50 said:
3. "Your mileage my vary". I always thought that sea level was sea level, but in fact, different places see different changes. I don't understand this. In the words of Ralph Wiggum, "that's unpossible!" In the US, the Atlantic seems to be more affected than the Pacific, and most of that is in the mid-Atlantic states. Florida has a substantially smaller measured increase. The peninsula you should be worried about is Delamarva.

The land locally may also move, so local measurements at different places don't measure the same quantity.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel-global-local.html
 
  • #26
I have read that the reason for "inconsistencies" in sea level changes in different areas as large amounts of ice scattered around the world melt is that not only is the melted ice adding water to the oceans, but it is also changing gravitational forces on the oceans. This reduces the tide-like gravitational attraction of water toward Greenland for example, thereby increasing the relative strength of tide-like attraction of water in other areas. Thus the water get redistributed unequally.

On a longer time scale, other changes will take place, such as rebounding of land (as perhaps, Greenland) as it is relieved for the weight of up to a mile or two of ice.
In addition, some places are just sinking for various reasons, such as in the Gulf of Mexico, or areas depleted of underground oil or water reserves.
 
Back
Top