Why do shells begin to hold more electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Metals
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Electrons
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the 2n^2 rule, which describes the increasing capacity of electron shells to hold electrons as they move further from the nucleus, with values of 2, 8, 18, 32, and so forth. The ability of outer shells to accommodate more electrons is linked to quantum mechanics, specifically the principal quantum number (n) and the angular momentum quantum number (l), which define the energy levels and orbital shapes of electrons. As electrons occupy higher energy levels, the coulombic attraction to the nucleus diminishes, allowing for greater electron capacity. This relationship is mathematically expressed, indicating that energy levels increase with n, and the volume of phase space available to electrons also expands, leading to the conclusion that higher shells can hold more electrons due to their larger spatial and momentum configurations. The conversation highlights the complexity of these concepts and the challenges of explaining "why" these principles exist in scientific terms.
Metals
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
So I've been told about the 2n^2 rule, and how the number of electrons held in each shell goes 2, 8, 18, 32, 50, 72, etc... But I am not aware of why shells further out from the nucleus are able to hold more electrons. Does this have something to do with spdf or energy levels?

Thank you.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
For neutral atoms, the number of electrons around the nuclear must provide the same charge as the number of protons (positive charges) in the nucleus. Note that the hydrogen atoms has a number of emission lines, so there are a number of 'orbitals' that an electron can occupy, but there is one ground state.

The 'orbits' are a reflection of the quantum states of electrons around a nucleus. They are described by a set of quantum numbers that address the potential energy, angular momentum and magnetic interaction of the electrons. The principal quantum number, n, determines principal energy level, and angular or azimuthal quantum number, l (s, p, d, f) is associated with the orbital angular momentum.

http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch6/quantum.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydcol.html
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
Astronuc said:
For neutral atoms, the number of electrons around the nuclear must provide the same charge as the number of protons (positive charges) in the nucleus. Note that the hydrogen atoms has a number of emission lines, so there are a number of 'orbitals' that an electron can occupy, but there is one ground state.

The 'orbits' are a reflection of the quantum states of electrons around a nucleus. They are described by a set of quantum numbers that address the potential energy, angular momentum and magnetic interaction of the electrons. The principal quantum number, n, determines principal energy level, and angular or azimuthal quantum number, l (s, p, d, f) is associated with the orbital angular momentum.

http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch6/quantum.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydcol.html
Why is it that the 'shells' further out from the nucleus have a higher energy level? And why can higher energy levels hold more electrons?
 
Metals said:
Why is it that the 'shells' further out from the nucleus have a higher energy level?

Because that's the way it is?

Seriously, "why" question is not the best one to ask here. In general it is often a bad question to ask in science.

I could answer "because when you calculate, you will find out, that the energy is proportional to -1/n2, so the higher the n, the higher the energy". Does it answer the question "why"? No, it doesn't, as you can ask "why" again. "Because the math says so". "Why?". "Get lost". Do you see the problem? ;)
 
Borek said:
Because that's the way it is?

Seriously, "why" question is not the best one to ask here. In general it is often a bad question to ask in science.

I could answer "because when you calculate, you will find out, that the energy is proportional to -1/n2, so the higher the n, the higher the energy". Does it answer the question "why"? No, it doesn't, as you can ask "why" again. "Because the math says so". "Why?". "Get lost". Do you see the problem? ;)

I see, fair enough. I'll try found out else where some time, thanks.
 
The energy of the electrons in shells further away from the nucleus increases, as the coulombic attraction by the nucleus is weaker (it falls off like 1/r with the distance r). That a higher shell can hold more electrons is a consequence of quantum mechanics. Namely, we know from Heisenberg's uncertainty relation that an electron will occupy a certain volume in phase space (which is spanned by the ordinary spatial coordinates + the momentum values). I will try to estimate very roughly how the total volume in phase space available to the electrons varies with energy. I shall use that potential and kinetic energy are of the same order of magnitude as the total energy E. Furthermore I drop all constants which do not depend on n or E:

Equating ##E_\mathrm{pot}\sim E \sim 1/n^2 \sim 1/r## we find that the volume of a sphere containing the electrons has a volume proportional to ##n^6##. Equating Kinetic energy, we obtain ##E_\mathrm{kin}\sim E \sim p^2 \sim 1/n^2## or ##p\sim 1/n##. Hence the total volume in phase space increases like ##p^3 r^3\sim n^3##. As n is the total number of shells up to the given energy, the volume of the shells is proportional to ##n^3/n=n^2##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
46K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K