Why do the conjugate classes of a group partition the group?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of conjugate classes in group theory, specifically addressing the question of whether the existence of a common element y in both class(a) and class(b) implies that class(a) equals class(b). The conclusion reached is that while y can belong to both classes, it does not necessarily mean that the two classes are identical, as there may exist elements unique to each class. This highlights the fundamental property of conjugate classes partitioning the group G into distinct subsets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically conjugate elements.
  • Familiarity with the definition of conjugate classes in a group.
  • Knowledge of group operations and their properties.
  • Basic mathematical reasoning skills to analyze set relationships.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group homomorphisms and their impact on conjugate classes.
  • Explore the concept of normal subgroups and their relationship to conjugate classes.
  • Investigate the role of the center of a group in relation to conjugate elements.
  • Learn about the application of conjugate classes in the context of representation theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the structural properties of groups and their classifications.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Given an element a in a group G,
class(a) = {all x in G such that there exists a g in G such that gxg^(-1) = a}

class(b) = {all x in G such that there exists a g in G such that gxg^(-1) = b}

so let's say y is a conjugate of both a and b, so it is in both class(a) and class(b), does that mean that class(a) = class(b)?

given there is an element y that is in both class(a) and class(b), couldn't there be an element q that is in one class and not the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I answered my own question, can't figure out how to delete this
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
574
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
572
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
921
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
894
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K