Why do these antennas have different radiation patterns?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in radiation patterns of antennas, particularly small-loop antennas, as explained in the third edition of Kraus's book on antennas. The primary factor influencing these differences is the wavelength, which affects the phase relationship between closely spaced rod antennas that comprise the loop. As the wavelength changes, the radiation pattern shifts due to variations in the array factor and the phase of the antennas. The conversation also highlights the importance of loop circumference and its relationship to frequency in determining radiation characteristics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antenna theory and radiation patterns
  • Familiarity with small-loop antennas and their configurations
  • Knowledge of phase relationships in antenna arrays
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the chapter on small-loop antennas in the second edition of Kraus's book
  • Explore the use of Eznec antenna simulation software for practical applications
  • Research the effects of loop circumference on radiation patterns
  • Learn about the impact of polarization on antenna radiation characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, antenna designers, and students of telecommunications seeking to deepen their understanding of antenna radiation patterns and their dependencies on wavelength and configuration.

qnach
Messages
154
Reaction score
4
In Kraus book on antenna (3ed page 203)
example 7-4.1
the difference between those antenna is (to my understanding) only the wave length.
How could they have different radiation pattern?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
qnach said:
In Kraus book on antenna (3ed page 203)
example 7-4.1
the difference between those antenna is (to my understanding) only the wave length.
How could they have different radiation pattern?

can you please photo the diagrams and post here
few of us have easy access to that book
 
Or perhaps you could refer to a diagram in the 2nd edition of Kraus's book, which is available as a PDF from several web sites.
 
davenn said:
can you please photo the diagrams and post here
few of us have easy access to that book
you can simply remove the word of "Kraus" the page number...etc and change the question into:

Why does an antenna has different radiation pattern at different wave-length?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Or perhaps you could refer to a diagram in the 2nd edition of Kraus's book, which is available as a PDF from several web sites.

It is on the chapter about small-loop antenna, i.e. chapter 6 of 2nd ed.
The example does not seems appear in the 2nd ed. But it is in the Figure 6-10.
 
qnach said:
It is on the chapter about small-loop antenna, i.e. chapter 6 of 2nd ed.
The example does not seems appear in the 2nd ed. But it is in the Figure 6-10.

From page 248
 

Attachments

  • AntennaPat.jpg
    AntennaPat.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 576
Stephen Tashi said:
From page 248
yes, thanks. but
Why does an antenna has different radiation pattern at different wave-length?
 
qnach said:
In Kraus book on antenna (3ed page 203)
example 7-4.1
the difference between those antenna is (to my understanding) only the wave length.
How could they have different radiation pattern?
A small loop may be regarded as two closely spaced rod antennas driven in anti-phase. This applies when looking from any direction in the plane of the loop. It occurs because there is no phase shift around the loop, because it is small compared with the wavelength, and the rods are being driven at opposite ends.
As the wavelength is reduced, there starts to be a phase difference between the two antennas, and the various patterns are simply the array factor of two antennas having the particular phase and spacing. For instance, when the circumference becomes a full wavelength, the two antennas become in-phase and radiation is then broadside to the plane of the loop. I can explain this in more detail if wanted.
The radiation from all antennas is fundamentally caused by the acceleration of charges in the conductor. This also applies to loop antennas. From memory, Kraus does not use this approach, whilst Terman does.
 
qnach said:
the difference between those antenna is (to my understanding) only the wave length.

Is there a confusion here? The antennas in the illustration are operating at the same wavelength but they have different diameters.
 
  • #10
Aaron Crowl said:
Is there a confusion here? The antennas in the illustration are operating at the same wavelength but they have different diameters.
My slight error. I think we mean loop diameter, which is equivalent to altering the wavelength.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
Aaron Crowl said:
Is there a confusion here? The antennas in the illustration are operating at the same wavelength but they have different diameters.

where the diameters are different portions or multiples of the (fixed) operating freq and are expressed in wavelengths or parts there of, of that frequency
 
  • #12
The diameter of the loop doesn't matter, by itself, but the circumference does and this depends on the diameter.

As you go around the circumference of a loop which is resonant, you would observe a standing wave pattern with alternate high and low voltage and current points.
This spacing of voltage and current points will vary with frequency.

It is the way that these are spaced that affects the radiation pattern.

In some directions, the resultant radiation will cancel due to the source radiations being out of phase with each other.
In other directions, the radiation will be in phase and the radiation will be enhanced.

There is an excellent antenna simulator called Eznec which is free to download in a demo version. It is great for learning about simple antennas and it produces results you could build if you wished.
 
  • #13
If doing manual calculations, be careful to remember that two polarizations need to be considered, each having its own radiation pattern. Of course, they are generally in phase and add to just give a single polarization, but the problem still needs to be analysed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K