Why do vacuum and the air behave so similarly ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the similarities between vacuum and Earth's atmosphere regarding media-dependent constants such as permeability, permittivity, and the speed of light. Despite the significant differences in composition and density, these constants exhibit nearly identical values in both media. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these differences in contexts requiring high sensitivity measurements, such as physics research. Additionally, it emphasizes that while air is often described as "filled with atoms," its interaction with light can be minimal, akin to vacuum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically permeability and permittivity
  • Familiarity with the speed of light in different media
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics, including interactions of neutrinos
  • Awareness of atmospheric physics and its effects on light propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences in electromagnetic properties between vacuum and various media, including air and water
  • Explore the concept of light scattering and its implications for atmospheric phenomena like star twinkling
  • Study the effects of air density on satellite drag and its relevance in orbital mechanics
  • Investigate the role of neutrinos in particle physics and their interactions with matter
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, atmospheric scientists, and students of electromagnetic theory who seek to deepen their understanding of media interactions and their implications in both theoretical and practical applications.

aaeushsingh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I may be in the dark here but many of the media-dependent constants like permeability, permittivity and even the speed of light are ALMOST identical in both media ie. vacuum and the atmosphere of the Earth. This exists even though the 2 are very different because one is almost empty and the other is filled all kinds of atoms and molecules, has definite volume and mass too.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
your thoughts ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaeushsingh said:
I may be in the dark here but many of the media-dependent constants like permeability, permittivity and even the speed of light are ALMOST identical in both media ie. vacuum and the atmosphere of the Earth. This exists even though the 2 are very different because one is almost empty and the other is filled all kinds of atoms and molecules, has definite volume and mass too.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
your thoughts ?

If you are in NY, and you want to know how long it will take to drive to, say, Schaumburg, IL, which is the suburb of Chicago, will it make any difference that someone tells you the distance between NY and Chicago (which is about 780 miles)? Will the extra few miles from Chicago to Schaumburg, IL makes any significant difference to the overtime travel time of your travel?

Here's what you can do. Make a table of all the common media, and list out their corresponding permittivitty (and permeability as well if you want to be complete). Now look at the difference between air-vacuum versus, say water-vacuum, glass-vacuum, etc... There are MANY instances where your instrument cannot tell the difference (i.e. they are either not accurate enough, or not sensitive enough) to detect the difference. In such a case, it really doesn't matter which one you use, so why not just assume vacuum values?

Note that in many physics research, this difference will start to matter, because they are making highly sensitive measurements. In some instances, even variation in air density with height, and even wind movement will come into play (know why stars twinkle?).

Zz.
 
aaeushsingh said:
I may be in the dark here but many of the media-dependent constants like permeability, permittivity and even the speed of light are ALMOST identical in both media ie. vacuum and the atmosphere of the Earth. This exists even though the 2 are very different because one is almost empty and the other is filled all kinds of atoms and molecules, has definite volume and mass too.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
your thoughts ?
It is misleading to say that the atmosphere is "filled with all kinds of atoms". It depends on how light would interact with them. A particle which has no electrical charge, like a neutrino, has very little chance of interacting with anything. 100 trillion neutrinos go unimpeded through your body every second. So the term "filled with atoms" is misleading. There is practically no chance of a particle actually hitting an atom unless it is attracted to it.
 
There are so many significant differences between air and vacuum: blue and red sky depend on air and you have to go hundreds of km above the Earth's surface before the effect of drag on satellites can be ignored.
The only similarity is that you can 'see' through them both and even that is just a matter of degree.
 
Also, only about 0.1-0.2% of the volume of air is actually filled with molecules. Air acts a lot like empty space because it's a lot like empty space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
18K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K