Why do we assume that the circulating pi electrons induce B

  • Thread starter Thread starter FTNMR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Pi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of circulating pi electrons in aromatic compounds and their interaction with external magnetic fields. Participants explore whether these electrons induce a magnetic field that adds to or opposes the external field, particularly in the context of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and the effects on protons in different molecular environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why circulating pi electrons are assumed to induce a magnetic field that adds to the external magnetic field rather than opposing it, suggesting that the orientation of the ring could influence this outcome.
  • There is speculation about whether the external magnetic field is the cause of the circulation of pi electrons, with some participants expressing confusion about the relationship between the two.
  • One participant suggests that the effect of the magnetic field on protons depends on their position relative to the aromatic ring, noting that in some exotic compounds, protons may experience a decreased magnetic field effect.
  • Another participant connects the discussion to Quantum Mechanics, comparing the situation to Larmor precession and emphasizing that the observed effects are results of prior discoveries rather than assumptions.
  • There is mention of the application of these concepts in NMR, with a focus on how local molecular magnetic fields can shift the nuclear resonant frequency of protons.
  • A participant provides specific examples from fullerene chemistry, discussing how the circulation of pi electrons can either shield or deshield protons, affecting their resonance in NMR measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the behavior of pi electrons and their effects on magnetic fields, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the assumptions regarding the direction of electron circulation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the terminology used, particularly regarding the "position of protons" and its implications in the context of NMR. There are also references to specific chemical compounds and their unique behaviors, which may not be universally applicable.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying chemistry, particularly in the areas of magnetic resonance and molecular behavior in external magnetic fields, as well as those exploring the theoretical underpinnings of these phenomena in Quantum Mechanics.

FTNMR
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Why do we assume that the circulating pi electrons induces another magnetic field, B_in, that adds to the external mag field, B_ext, instead of opposing B_ext? Couldnt the pi electrons just as easily oppose B_ext?

This lecture says the protons on benzene will experience greater effectual field, B_eff, because the circulating pi electrons induces another field that adds to the B_ext.
But if ring is flipped, then wouldn't that mean that B_in then opposes B_ext.. Also what if pi electrons circulate other direction? then according to RHR B_in would again oppose B_ext.

Im wondering if this has something to do with the fact that I am looking at this in 2 dimensions.. maybe not important idk..
Thanks for any explanation or help
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Well I'm thinking: an opposing field with be an extra negative field.
Do the pi electrons ever circulate to oppose the external field? i.e. if you flipped the ring, would the pi electrons start circulating the other way?
i.e. what makes them circulate?
 
is it the actual external mag field that causes the circulation to begin with? If it does then I think I am starting to understand, but if not then I think I am more confused. please answer again, thanks
 
OK i think it is the field that causes the pi electrons to circulate to begin with..so whether it opposes or adds to external field is just the right hand rule then.. is that correct understanding?
 
You "think"? You should go to your notes and check. I'm just asking you questions.
 
Just checking - it looks to me like a QM effect similar to Larmor precession.
Looking at something like ethyne - you can think of the atoms all lined up along the z-axis, but there is an ambiguity to how the triple bond electrons are oriented ... the time-average will be something like a cylinder. That should start you off ... or you can just use the result.

i.e. you are not "assuming" the result, it is the result because someone looked and discovered it.
Just like you don't assume that the Sun is a big ball of burning gas a long way away.
All the QM explanation will do is provide a math model for the result.
 
Whether the field increases or decreases depends on the position of the protons. There are some exotic aromatic compounds where one proton points inside the ring instead of outside and the field they feel is decreased instead of increased.
 
"Position of protons"? "... proton points..."?
Is this chemistry talk?

Guessing: location of atom in the molecule, and orientation direction of the nuclear magnetic moment?
 
It would be interesting to get some more information on the application. Is this perhaps an MRI (NMR) and the proton experiences a shift in the nuclear resonant frequency (at which r-f absorption takes place) from that of a bare proton because of local molecular magnetic fields(from the pi electrons) that add to the applied (static) magnetic field? It appears the subject might be chemical shifts in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. A google of the topic shows quite a lot of studies have been done for the shifts found for various substances.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Simon Bridge said:
"Position of protons"? "... proton points..."?
Is this chemistry talk?
Well, 1H-NMR talk, to be precise.
 
  • #11
DrDu said:
Whether the field increases or decreases depends on the position of the protons. There are some exotic aromatic compounds where one proton points inside the ring instead of outside and the field they feel is decreased instead of increased.

Shameless self-advertisement (from my bygone days as a fullerene chemist): http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja901383r

Whereas in benzene, the circulation of the pi electrons acts to deshield the protons, shifting their resonances downfield, in this case, the circulation of the pi electrons on the fullerene cage shields the methane protons (and the 13C nucleus) inside the fullerene, shifting their resonances upfield by a large amount (##\delta_H = -12.32## ppm and ##\delta_C = -20.62## ppm in case you don't have access to the paper). You see the same effect when H2, H2O, and NH3 are put into fullerenes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K