Why Do We Use Different Pairs of Filters to Determine the Temperature of Stars?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the use of different pairs of filters (such as R-I and B-V) to determine the temperature of stars based on their color indices. Participants explore the implications of using specific filters for stars of varying temperatures, considering the effects on measurement accuracy and the characteristics of blackbody radiation curves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why different pairs of filters are necessary for cool versus hot stars, noting that blackbody radiation curves vary with temperature and thus affect the values of color indices like B-V, U-B, and V-R.
  • It is proposed that R-I filters are preferred for cooler stars to avoid blocking out most of the light, as these stars emit less visible light at higher frequencies.
  • Participants reference a plot comparing filter bandpasses for 3000 K and 10,000 K blackbodies, indicating that hot stars have limited light in the I band while cool stars have limited light in the B band.
  • There is a concern about the accuracy of temperature calculations based on color indices, with some arguing that using different filters should not significantly affect the accuracy since lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, and R-I correspond to temperatures.
  • One participant emphasizes that lower light intensity leads to fewer photons for measurement, which can reduce accuracy, particularly for dim stars when using filters that block more light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and impact of using specific filters for temperature determination, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy implications of using different color indices.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of measurement accuracy on the number of photons detected, suggesting that the choice of filters can influence the reliability of temperature estimates, but the specific effects remain under debate.

heavystray
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hi, in determining the temperature of stars using colour index (U-B,B-V,V-R, etc), why do we need to use the appropriate pairs of filters based on their range of temperature? (this is what i read from wiki)

For cool stars, we use R-I, and for hotter stars, we use B-V. I don't understand how using different pairs of filters make a difference because isn't radiation curve of blackbodies with different temperature have different shape and thus, the values of (B-V, U-B, V-R) will also be different? (I hope you understand what I'm trying too say)

My idea is this has to do with the star's peak wavelength...but i still don't see the justification to that...
your help would be greatly appreciated
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
heavystray said:
For cool stars, we use R-I, and for hotter stars, we use B-V. I don't understand how using different pairs of filters make a difference because isn't radiation curve of blackbodies with different temperature have different shape and thus, the values of (B-V, U-B, V-R) will also be different? (I hope you understand what I'm trying too say)

I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.
 
Drakkith said:
I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.

Right. Look at this plot showing the filter bandpasses with a 3000 K (red) blackbody and a 10,000K (blue) blackbody. You can see that the hot blue star doesn't have much light in the I band, and the cool red star doesn't have much in the B band.
Filter.png
 

Attachments

  • Filter.png
    Filter.png
    15.5 KB · Views: 929
phyzguy said:
Right. Look at this plot showing the filter bandpasses with a 3000 K (red) blackbody and a 10,000K (blue) blackbody. You can see that the hot blue star doesn't have much light in the I band, and the cool red star doesn't have much in the B band.
View attachment 219165
but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

thanks for your answer
 
Drakkith said:
I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.
yes it's easier to measure, but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

thanks for your answer
 
heavystray said:
yes it's easier to measure, but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

The lower the light intensity, the fewer photons there are to measure and the lower the accuracy. If you take a star, which is dim to begin with, then add a filter that removes most of the photons, you can end up with a surprisingly small number of photons. Since the photons are distributed according to a Poisson distribution, the error goes down as 1/(sqrt(N). So the more photons you have, the smaller the error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K