Why do you need to measure the speed of light in two directions?

Click For Summary
Measuring the speed of light in both directions is essential for accuracy due to the challenges of clock synchronization in an inertial frame. While a one-way measurement from point A to B may seem straightforward, it relies on the assumption that the clocks at both points are synchronized, which is problematic because signals cannot travel faster than light. Using a round-trip measurement eliminates this synchronization issue, as only one clock is needed to measure the time taken for light to travel to point B and back to A. The discussion highlights that any method of synchronization, including slow clock transport, ultimately leads to the same conclusion about the speed of light, reinforcing the principles of Special Relativity. Thus, understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the nature of light's speed and the implications of relativity.
  • #121
"my point is that even if both A and B are inertial reference frames, that does not imply they are stationary relative to each other. They may be moving together or apart at a constant rate, or one or both may be free falling with a net acceleration between them."

It's even worse than that Bahama :)

The definition of something being 'at rest' in relativity is that it has a uniform motion, nothing more.

You don't have any 'acceleration' at all in uniform motion, and your relative 'velocity' (I won't use speed here as that says nothing about a direction) doesn't mean a thing as I understands it for defining yourself as being 'at rest' relative something else.

There is no 'universal resting place', only relative ones. And what differs being 'at rest in a uniform motion relative being 'at rest' in a acceleration is that in a acceleration you know that you have inertia/gravity acting at you locally, constantly or intermediately, if now that is the right word to use?

If you introduce a third reference frame from where you define two comoving uniformly moving objects to be 'moving', you might do it relative a third frame, as the 'universe' at large for example. That doesn't change the fact that both can define themselves as being 'at rest' relative each other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K