MHB Why Does 0.27 Degrees Equal 3π/2000 in Trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buttretler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
buttretler
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Couldn't figure out why. Where 0.27 deg =3pi/2000. Now the only way I could figure this out is 270 deg = 3pi/2. multiply by 1000 to get the 270 and the 2000, but gives 3000pi/2000? Anyone tell me where this came? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ineedhelppp said:
So this is a small part that's given in a problem which I don't know where came from. Where 0.27 deg =3pi/2000. Now the only way I could figure this out is 270 deg = 3pi/2. multiply by 1000 to get the 270 and the 2000, but is it still 3pi/2000 and not 3000pi/2000? Anyone tell me where this came? Thanks

Welcome to MHB, Ineedhelppp! :)

I'm not entirely sure where you are stuck.You have:
$$270^\circ = \frac{3\pi}{2}$$
Multiply both sides by 1/1000:
$$270^\circ \cdot \frac{1}{1000} = \frac{3\pi}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{1000}$$
Apply the rules how to multiply fractions:
$$0.27^\circ = \frac{3\pi \cdot 1}{2 \cdot 1000}$$
Simplify:
$$0.27^\circ = \frac{3\pi}{2000}$$
 
Thank you so much. Once you go days studying, you start to lose focus on simple things. Thanks again.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top