MHB Why Does 0.27 Degrees Equal 3π/2000 in Trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buttretler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conversion of 0.27 degrees to radians, specifically why 0.27 degrees equals 3π/2000. The user initially struggles with the relationship between 270 degrees and its radian equivalent, 3π/2, and attempts to manipulate these values. A response clarifies that by multiplying both sides of the equation by 1/1000, the conversion yields 0.27 degrees as 3π/2000. This simplification process highlights the importance of understanding fraction multiplication in trigonometric conversions. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification after a period of confusion.
buttretler
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Couldn't figure out why. Where 0.27 deg =3pi/2000. Now the only way I could figure this out is 270 deg = 3pi/2. multiply by 1000 to get the 270 and the 2000, but gives 3000pi/2000? Anyone tell me where this came? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ineedhelppp said:
So this is a small part that's given in a problem which I don't know where came from. Where 0.27 deg =3pi/2000. Now the only way I could figure this out is 270 deg = 3pi/2. multiply by 1000 to get the 270 and the 2000, but is it still 3pi/2000 and not 3000pi/2000? Anyone tell me where this came? Thanks

Welcome to MHB, Ineedhelppp! :)

I'm not entirely sure where you are stuck.You have:
$$270^\circ = \frac{3\pi}{2}$$
Multiply both sides by 1/1000:
$$270^\circ \cdot \frac{1}{1000} = \frac{3\pi}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{1000}$$
Apply the rules how to multiply fractions:
$$0.27^\circ = \frac{3\pi \cdot 1}{2 \cdot 1000}$$
Simplify:
$$0.27^\circ = \frac{3\pi}{2000}$$
 
Thank you so much. Once you go days studying, you start to lose focus on simple things. Thanks again.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top