Why Does \( a^3 \equiv a \mod 3 \) Hold for All Integers \( a \)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RichardParker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the modular arithmetic property \( a^3 \equiv a \mod 3 \) for all integers \( a \). Participants are exploring the reasoning behind this assertion and attempting to provide proofs or justifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different cases for \( a \) being even or odd, and some suggest a more general approach without these assumptions. Questions arise regarding the divisibility of \( a^3 - a \) by 3 and how to prove this holds for all integers.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches and questioning the validity of their reasoning. Some have offered insights into the structure of consecutive integers and their relationship to the problem, while others reference Fermat's Little Theorem as a potential proof method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of proving a general statement about integers without relying solely on specific cases. There is an emphasis on finding a universally applicable argument.

RichardParker
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a [tex]\in[/tex] Z, then [tex]a^3 \equiv a (mod 3)[/tex].

2. The attempt at a solution

Proof: Suppose a [tex]\in[/tex] Z. Thus a is either odd or even.

Case 1: Let a be even. Thus a = 2k, for some [tex]k[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] Z. So [tex]a^3 - a = 8k^3 -2k = 2(4k^3 - k) = 2(k)(2k - 1)(2k + 1)[/tex]. Notice that, for all [tex]k[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] Z, [tex](k)(2k - 1)(2k + 1) = 3b[/tex], for some [tex]b[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] Z. Thus [tex]a^3 - a = 2*3b[/tex]. This means [tex]3|(a^3 - a)[/tex]. Therefore [tex]a^3 \equiv a (mod 3)[/tex].

(I did not continue with the case of a being odd.)

My question is how do I prove that [tex](k)(2k - 1)(2k + 1) = 3b[/tex], for some [tex]b[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] Z, is it enough that [tex](k)(2k - 1)(2k + 1) = 3b[/tex] is observable on any k?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try your argument on a3 - a without assuming a even or odd.
 
Thanks for your reply.

Without assuming a even or odd,

a(a-1)(a+1) = 3b, for some b element of the set of integers. It is observable that a^3 - a is divisible by 3 for any value of a that I plug in. But how do I prove that this will hold for all a element of integers?

Thanks once again!
 
RichardParker said:
Thanks for your reply.

Without assuming a even or odd,

a(a-1)(a+1) = 3b, for some b element of the set of integers. It is observable that a^3 - a is divisible by 3 for any value of a that I plug in. But how do I prove that this will hold for all a element of integers?

Thanks once again!

Well, a-1, a, a+1 are three consecutive integers...
 
Proof: Fermat's Little Theorem! Q.E.D
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K