Why Does a Resistor Show Different Values in AC and DC Measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Lobster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac Dc Resistor
Click For Summary
The resistance of a resistor can show different values when measured with AC versus DC due to several factors. In AC circuits, the effective resistance is often determined using RMS (root mean square) values of voltage and current, which can differ from DC measurements. Additionally, phenomena such as skin effect, where current tends to flow near the surface of the conductor, and the inductive and capacitive behaviors of circuit elements contribute to this discrepancy. The relationship between instantaneous voltage and current may appear inconsistent due to the phase differences in AC signals. Overall, the varying characteristics of resistors under different current types lead to measurable differences in resistance values.
The_Lobster
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If possible, find reasons why the resistance of a resistor may have a different value when measured with a sine wave signal (a.c.) than when measured with a d.c. (dirrect current) source.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Please correct me if anything of what I've said below could be wrong in some way:

In an AC circuit, the sinusoidal current through a resistor is given by: i = Isin \omega t. From Ohm's law, the instantaneous potential v_R is: v_R = iR = (IR)sin \omega t = V_R sin \omega t.

What I don't get here, is that, according to the equation v_R = iR, the relationship between the instantaneous voltage and current is constant (giving R), but if we graph this, since the two are in phase, both the current and the voltage across the resistor will be 0 once every cycle. Doesn't that mean that the resistance, R, of the resistor will also vary? In this illustration: http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/resistor/res32.gif , we also see that the voltage has steeper curves than the current, and they're not proportional, so v_R = iR isn't true? I find this really confusing...

If we only look at the peak voltages, the resistance would be the peak of the voltage divided by the peak of the current.. it's only when we're talking about instantaneous current and voltage I'm getting confused...

Aside from what I've written above, whenever the frequency of the changing current in a circuit is any other than 0 (DC), any circuit element will exhibit some combination of resistive, capacitive and inductive behaviour. May this mean that we might see a slight drop in resistance measured on the resistor because of the "imagined" inductor in series with it?

Lastly, I read about something called the "skin effect" and the proximity effect that might effect circuit elements when there's an alternating current. Is this something different than the above? Or is it simply another way of saying that each element exhibits some inductive, capaticive, etc. behaviour?

J:-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The_Lobster said:

Homework Statement


If possible, find reasons why the resistance of a resistor may have a different value when measured with a sine wave signal (a.c.) than when measured with a d.c. (dirrect current) source.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Please correct me if anything of what I've said below could be wrong in some way:

In an AC circuit, the sinusoidal current through a resistor is given by: i = Isin \omega t. From Ohm's law, the instantaneous potential v_R is: v_R = iR = (IR)sin \omega t = V_R sin \omega t.

What I don't get here, is that, according to the equation v_R = iR, the relationship between the instantaneous voltage and current is constant (giving R), but if we graph this, since the two are in phase, both the current and the voltage across the resistor will be 0 once every cycle. Doesn't that mean that the resistance, R, of the resistor will also vary? In this illustration: http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/resistor/res32.gif , we also see that the voltage has steeper curves than the current, and they're not proportional, so v_R = iR isn't true? I find this really confusing...

If we only look at the peak voltages, the resistance would be the peak of the voltage divided by the peak of the current.. it's only when we're talking about instantaneous current and voltage I'm getting confused...

Aside from what I've written above, whenever the frequency of the changing current in a circuit is any other than 0 (DC), any circuit element will exhibit some combination of resistive, capacitive and inductive behaviour. May this mean that we might see a slight drop in resistance measured on the resistor because of the "imagined" inductor in series with it?

Lastly, I read about something called the "skin effect" and the proximity effect that might effect circuit elements when there's an alternating current. Is this something different than the above? Or is it simply another way of saying that each element exhibits some inductive, capaticive, etc. behaviour?

J:-)

When measuring AC quantities you use rms. So the resistance is the ratio of the rms of the voltage and the rms value of the current.
The reasons to measure different values in AC and DC are the other ones you cited: skin effect (most resistors are made of a thin layer of conductive material over a ceramic substrate), inductance and capacitance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K