Why Does Aiming Lower in Projectile Motion Miss the Target?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oblivinated
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Gravity Gun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of projectile motion, specifically the correct aiming strategy for a spring-loaded gun to hit a distant target. The consensus is that to accurately hit the bull's eye, the gun should be aimed slightly higher than the target (option b), countering the effects of gravity during the projectile's flight. The initial upward component of the bullet's velocity does not negate the constant downward acceleration due to gravity, which results in the bullet dropping below the intended target if aimed too low. This highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between horizontal and vertical motion in projectile dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with vector components of motion
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration effects on projectiles
  • Concept of ideal conditions in physics (ignoring air resistance)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of motion for projectiles under gravity
  • Learn about vector decomposition in physics
  • Explore the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories
  • Investigate real-world applications of projectile motion in ballistics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and anyone interested in the practical applications of physics in aiming and ballistics.

oblivinated
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Any help or simply reasons why my answer is incorrect would help greatly, thanks!

Question:

A projectile is fired from a horizontal spring-loaded gun aimed directly (along the line of sight) at a distant bull’s eye. Because of the pull of gravity during flight, the projectile misses and hits a point at a distance y beneath the bull’s eye. To hit the bull’s eye, the gun should be aimed along a line of sight above the bull’s eye, a vertical distance……

http://oblivinated.staticcling.org/files/Images/PhysicsImage.gif

a) of y, exactly.
b) slightly higher than y.
c) slightly lower than y.

My Answer:

c) slightly lower than y
At first this may seem counter intuitive, however, given the very nature at aiming lower despite having to travel farther. However, given the fact that bullets fired from a gun travel at amazing speeds, aiming slightly lower than y will produce the best results. First off, by aiming above the bull’s eye and firing, I am creating two vectors: one horizontal vector and one vertical vector. The horizontal vector will carry the bullet towards the bull’s eye, while the vertical vector should give it enough distance to drop into the bull’s eye. HOWEVER, since there is now a vertical upward vector, it will reduce the vertical downward vector (gravity), WHICH MEANS that it will not drop the full distance of y. It will land slightly above the bull’s eye. Therefore, to counter the effects of hitting slightly above, you must aim slightly lower than the distance of y. The below figure should clarify things:

My Dilemma:

The reason I am asking is because I do not agree with the answer my physics professor provided (which, by the way, was b). However, I am skeptical about arguing with him. I was just hoping to see what everyone thinks. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
b is correct.

The initial upward componant of the bullet's velocity does not affect the constant downward acceleration due to gravity (one's a velocity, one's an acceleration, they don't add).

Since you must aim upward, there will be less horizontal velocity, therefore it will take more time for the bullet to get to the plane of the target. The bullet will now have more time to drop away from the straight line path along which it was aimed.

Also, keep in mind that this problem assumes ideal conditions (no effects from air resistance). The high speed of a bullet earns no special treatment.
 
Thanks, you guys are awesome ^_^.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K