Hitting a rocket with a projectile

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of a projectile shot at a rocket just as it reaches its maximum height. The initial conditions involve a person shooting a projectile at a speed v0 and angle θ0 from a distance d, with the rocket experiencing vertical acceleration due to gravity. The participants work through equations to express tan(θ0) in terms of variables A, B, d, and g, avoiding the use of v0. After several iterations and corrections, the final expression derived for tan(θ0) is 3A(A + 2g)/(4Bd), which is confirmed to be dimensionally correct. The discussion concludes with one participant successfully passing their course, indicating the resolution of their queries.
  • #31
Thanks, I finally got ##\tan (\theta) = \frac {3A( A + 2 g )} {4 d B^2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
But...why it’s still incorrect?
 
  • #33
It is should be ##\frac { 3A( A + 2g )} {4Bd}##?
Because ##v_{x,0}= \frac {Bd(\sqrt{3A/B})} {3A}##
where,##v_{x,0} t_f= d##
 
Last edited:
  • #34
MichaelTam said:
Thanks, I finally got ##\tan (\theta) = \frac {3A( A + 2 g )} {4 d B^2}##
Use dimensional analysis to check your working.
Given the rocket's acceleration formula, A has dimension LT-2, B is LT-4. Your answer above fails the test.
 
  • #35
So the A must be in two dimension and B is 4 dimension, or A should be 1 dimension and B should be 3 dimension?
 
  • #36
6479EA76-6602-4E3F-A8C0-D0E142FF536B.png
BED5A3AA-BB66-48D4-91BA-8C4D309F1362.jpeg
7977515F-EFCC-4BCF-8680-74975B05BDA6.jpeg
95A62AF4-BB3E-4931-99D6-439D771F43B8.jpeg
 
  • #37
I had post all of m steps and assumptions, but I don’t know where I am wrong?
 
  • #38
Is this time I get the correct dimensions of both A and B?
 
  • #39
MichaelTam said:
So the A must be in two dimension and B is 4 dimension, or A should be 1 dimension and B should be 3 dimension?
Sounds like you have not learned dimensional analysis. You should, it's quite easy and very useful.
 
  • #40
I know, but I find don’t know if 3Ag is in two dimension, and## 4dB^2## is in 4 dimensions respect to time?Can I count the g as a dimension for 3Ag?And is ##4dB^2## is not in 4 dimension but in 3 dimension?
 
  • #41
I just remember the analysis...when you tell me up about that tool.
 
  • #42
MichaelTam said:
I know, but I find don’t know if 3Ag is in two dimension, and## 4dB^2## is in 4 dimensions respect to time?
[Ag]=LT-2LT-2=L2T-4
[dB2]=L(LT-4)2=L3T-8.
 
  • #43
So it still incorrect?But where I am wrong...Is my assumption of ##v_{x,0}## is not correct or I make mistake on the ##v_{y,0}##?
 
  • #44
MichaelTam said:
So it still incorrect?But where I am wrong...
The point about using dimensional analysis is that you can check each step. Use 'binary chop'. Start in the middle of your working; if it's ok there go to three quarters of the way , etc.
 
  • #45
Ok, I am trying
 
  • #46
My assumption in the
## v_{y,0}-(gt_f/2)= (At_f/2) - (Bt_f/12)## ( after simplify ) is not correct in dimension ?
 
  • #47
I still can’t find out how I get wrong although I know the thing I said before is wrong, I don’t know how to fix it...
 
  • #48
Your last line in post #36 is ##\tan(\theta)=\frac{3A(A+2g)}{4Bd}##, which is dimensionally correct and looks like the right answer to me.
How do you know it is wrong?
 
  • #49
You mean plus or equal of the symbol?
 
  • #50
MichaelTam said:
You mean plus or equal of the symbol?
=
 
  • #51
Thanks!
 
  • #52
I pass the course!,!,!
B06E2143-66C3-44D9-B030-158F265B1AD1.png
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #53
Thanks!You a lot!Very much!
 
  • #54
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Hamiltonian and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K