Why Does Apparent Weight Change on a Ferris Wheel?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the apparent weight changes experienced by riders at the top and bottom of a Ferris wheel, focusing on the concepts of centripetal acceleration and the forces involved in circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between centripetal acceleration and the forces acting on a rider, questioning how these forces contribute to the normal force and apparent weight. Some express confusion about the directionality of forces and the implications of the equations used to describe the scenario.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and roles of forces in circular motion, with some participants providing insights into Newton's laws and the nature of centripetal force. Multiple interpretations of the forces involved are being discussed, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of centripetal force and its distinction from other forces, as well as the implications of varying speeds on apparent weight. There is also a mention of textbook references that may influence understanding.

mvpshaq32
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain the shift in apparent weight at the top and bottom of a ferris wheel.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am just not able to grasp centripetal acceleration. I understand at the top point, gravity AND centripetal acceleration are downwards, so then why in the equation for Normal force N=m(g - v^2/r) imply that these forces are acting in opposite directions? And if they both point downwards, I would assume normal force would also be greater at the top point than at the bottom point. Can someone explain this?
Also, in my textbook, it says that if the ride goes fast enough such that g=v^2/r, then N=0 and the passenger is about to be airborne. Why would this happen if you eliminate the upward force and have only the downward forces? Is this not counter intuitive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mvpshaq32 said:
I am just not able to grasp centripetal acceleration. I understand at the top point, gravity AND centripetal acceleration are downwards, so then why in the equation for Normal force N=m(g - v^2/r) imply that these forces are acting in opposite directions?
What forces? The only forces involved are the normal force (which is the apparent weight) and gravity. And they do point in opposite directions. v^2/r is the acceleration, not a separate force.

As always, just use Newton's 2nd law:
ΣF = ma
N - mg = -mv^2/r
 
Centripetal acceleration is the acceleration which keeps an object in circular motion.

Since the rider is moving in a circle, the net forces on him must add up to cause only this centripetal acceleration. Add up the forces acting on the rider and see how they must result in this one force toward the hub of the wheel.

Consider at any instant what would happen to the rider if the wheel blinked out of existence.
 
keep in mind that centripatal force is not any new force .. its just a force (of Columbian or gravitational origin) which allows something to move in circle.

At the top point what is the force (in terms of gravity and normal rxn) providing centripetal force?
 
actually centripetal force is not a force itself. the forces acting on the particle give it the centripetal acceleration in order to make it move in circular path. so here the net downward force is :
mg - N
this is equal to to mv^2/r
from here you get : mg - mv^2/r = N
hope this helps...
 
ashishsinghal said:
actually centripetal force is not a force itself. [...]
Hua? Don't confuse the centripetal force which is a physical force with the centrifugal force which is an apparent force when we adopt a rotating frame of reference.
 
i meant that there is no additional force such as centripetal force. it is provided by other forces acting radially.
for eg. tension provides centripetal force to the pendulum.
i am not being confused...maybe the language suggested otherwise to you
 
ashishsinghal said:
i meant that there is no additional force such as centripetal force. it is provided by other forces acting radially.
for eg. tension provides centripetal force to the pendulum.
i am not being confused...maybe the language suggested otherwise to you

My apologies. Now I see what you meant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
957
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K