Why does candyfloss absorb more moisture faster than grain sugar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevin_tee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sugar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why candyfloss absorbs moisture more rapidly than grain sugar. It explores factors such as the chemical composition of sugars, surface area, and the effects of heating and caramelization on moisture absorption. The conversation includes both theoretical and practical considerations related to candy making and sugar behavior in humid conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the decomposition of sucrose into glucose and fructose may influence moisture absorption, while others question the role of surface area and caramelization.
  • There is a discussion about whether the candyfloss is heated to caramelization temperature or left at room temperature, with one participant confirming they heat it until it melts.
  • Concerns are raised about the arrangement of tests and the conditions under which sugars were heated, with a suggestion that heating above boiling temperature may reduce water adsorption unless the sugars are allowed to cool and absorb moisture afterward.
  • One participant notes that candyfloss becomes sticky shortly after being made, and this phenomenon can also be replicated with melted fine sugar that absorbs moisture over time.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of measuring adsorbed moisture for a serious evaluation of the situation, highlighting the significance of surface area in the speed of adsorption.
  • There is a mention of the candy making industry and the challenges of preventing candy from becoming gooey due to humidity, with references to research on factors affecting sugar caking.
  • Some participants express the belief that the presence of reducing sugars, such as glucose and fructose resulting from caramelization, contributes to the stickiness of candyfloss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the factors influencing moisture absorption in candyfloss versus grain sugar. There is no consensus on the primary reasons, and multiple competing explanations are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of quantitative measurements of moisture absorption and the dependence on specific experimental conditions that may not be universally applicable. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the chemical processes involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in candy making, food science, or anyone curious about the physical and chemical properties of sugars in relation to moisture absorption.

kevin_tee
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Does it have to do with sucrose decompose into glucose and fructose or surface area? Caramelization occurs when sugar start to melt, so does it have to do with caramelization?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Are you heating your candy floss to caramelization temperature?
Or is it at room temperature?
 
256bits said:
Are you heating your candy floss to caramelization temperature?
Or is it at room temperature?

I heat it, so it would melt.
 
How were your tests arranged?
But if you heat these sugars well above boiling temperature of water, there should be less water adsorbed, except you led both sugars cool down and give them time to adsorb water.
 
ovacs said:
How were your tests arranged?
But if you heat these sugars well above boiling temperature of water, there should be less water adsorbed, except you led both sugars cool down and give them time to adsorb water.

I noticed it when I made candy floss, it becomes sticky after a few minutes.
This can be replicate by melting fine sugar then let it cool and harden, after a few hours it will absorb moisture and dissolve it self.
 
Without weighing the adsorbed moisture, there can be no serious evaluation what happens. As you write, the surface area is important about the speed of adsorption as diffusion distance is short. But i can not give any clue about the influence of caramelization.
 
Thank you. But I think that it have to do with fructose and glucose.
 
kevin_tee,
Originally I was not sure what you were asking about. But now I understand you are asking about the candy becoming gooey from humidity - an important question in the candy making industry where one does not want the candy to become gooey to the touch all too soon, if at all.

Even important in sugar transport, where one does not want the sugar to cake together and become one big lump. For table salt, the processors add calcium silicate to keep the salt crystals free flowing, but for table sugar that most likely does not work, as at home my sugar has been known to lump together ( I don't have a bag of sugar to check for additional ingredients ).

Here,
http://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/Effects%20of%20grain%20size,%20reducing%20sugar%20content,%20temperature%20and%20pressure%20on%20caking%20of%20raw%20sugar.pdf
someone has done a bit of research on raw sugar.
They mention temperature, relative humidity, grain size, and the presence of reducing sugars as factors.

Reducing sugars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reducing_sugar
would become syrupy and sticky with moisture, and one has the glucose and fructose acting reducing sugars, present from the caramelization of sucrose.

You can follow those leads and see what the candy industry does to their products to combat stickiness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you very much, I appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K