Why Does Centripetal Force Keep Objects at a Constant Distance from the Pivot?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of centripetal force and its role in maintaining an object's constant distance from a pivot during circular motion. Participants explore theoretical and conceptual aspects of centripetal force, its implications in various contexts such as orbital mechanics and practical examples like rotating objects on a table.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why an object in circular motion does not get pulled inward, suggesting that its tendency to "escape" in a straight line balances the inward pull of centripetal force.
  • Another participant agrees with the idea of "escaping" and relates it to how celestial bodies like the moon and satellites maintain their orbits.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that momentum and energy are vectors, and a change in direction requires a force, which is often referred to as centripetal force.
  • One participant introduces the concept of applying more than the required centripetal force, leading to an increase in rotation speed and a change in distance from the pivot, using figure skating as an illustrative example.
  • Another participant argues that orbiting planets do not maintain a constant distance from their pivot points, highlighting that total energy remains constant despite this variation.
  • A participant discusses the mechanics of an object rotating on a table, emphasizing the constraints of a rope and the forces involved in maintaining circular motion.
  • One participant elaborates on the dynamics of a two-body system in space, describing how gravitational forces dictate elliptical or circular paths, and mentions the conservation of angular momentum in these scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the nature of centripetal force and its effects on motion. While some acknowledge the balancing act between outward inertia and inward force, others challenge the notion of constant distance in various contexts, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of forces, the definitions of centripetal force, and the conditions under which objects maintain circular motion. There are also references to specific examples that may not fully capture the complexities of the discussed phenomena.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
trivial centripetal force...

hello forum,

a simple, qualitative question.

A centripetal force serves to curve the trajectory of an object (acceleration that only changes the velocity direction, not the magnitude).

But why is the object not pulled inward as well? I can see the turning but not the fact that the obj stays at a constant distance from the pivot.

If the object was a rest, a force towards the center would drag it there. But if the obj rotates, it doesn't. For the fact that it has speed. Is it maybe always trying to "escape" in the straight line, so the distance that it would be pulled in is matched by a distance traveled radially out?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Is it maybe always trying to "escape" in the straight line, so the distance that it would be pulled in is matched by a distance traveled radially out?
Yes! That is how the moon and various satellites stay in orbit around the earth, and the planets stay in orbit around the sun.
 


fisico30 said:
A centripetal force serves to curve the trajectory of an object (acceleration that only changes the velocity direction, not the magnitude).

But why is the object not pulled inward as well? I can see the turning but not the fact that the obj stays at a constant distance from the pivot.

It's because momentum and energy are both vectors. Even if the object keeps the same rotation speed, a change in direction means a change in momentum, and that means applying a force. Usually when someone says centripetal force, they are talking about this required force.

If you apply even more than the required force, then yes it does move closer to the middle, and it increases the rotation speed in order to conserve momentum and energy (v = wr). Next time you watch figure skating (lol), watch for when the skater spins with their leg sticking out and begins to pull their leg in. As they apply a force greater than the centripetal force, they move their body closer to the center of rotation, and their rotation speed increases. I wish I knew the name of that move since it's a great example of rotational physics.
 


An object need not stay at a constant distance from the pivot point of a curve. Orbiting planets, for example, don't, and the total energy stays constant.
 


hi mathman,
i would like to comment on your good answer:
I get the moon orbiting the earth. The moon is moving fast enough and at the same time free falling, such that it never falls on the ground but continues to fall. Its free fall trajectory matches the curvature of the earth.

But in the case of an object, on a table, rotating in a circle (pivot at the center) because attached to a rope. The object wants to go straight. The rope is a constraint. It cannot extend.

The other example: A rotating object on a table supports from falling another object attached to the other end of the rope . There is a hole in the table and the rope passes through it to connect to vertical object. I can see the body diagrams but it still does not physically make sense...
 


fisico30 said:
A centripetal force serves to curve the trajectory of an object (acceleration that only changes the velocity direction, not the magnitude). But why is the object not pulled inward as well?
Being turned is being pulled "inwards" towards some point perpendicular to the path the object would otherwise be traveling if it wasn't for the centripetal force.
A rotating object on a table supports from falling another object attached to the other end of the rope. There is a hole in the table and the rope passes through it to connect to vertical object.
The rotating object applies a tension force to the rope = m v^2 / r. The hanging object applies a tension force to the rope = m g. If these two forces are equal, the hanging object doesn't move, and the rotating object moves in a circle. If the forces aren't equal, then the rotating object's path is initially a spiral and the hanging object moves up or down. The change in gravitational potential energy of the hanging object is converted into kinetic energy of the rotating object. It's angular momentum is preserved through all of this though. Assuming no friction, then momentum effect cause "over-correction", and the rotating object transitions between spiraling outwards and inwards, while the hanging object travels up and down. I'm not sure of the actual path.

In a two body system in outer space, with gravity as the only force between the two objects, the two objects will each follow a elliptical path or possibly a circular path. There are some animations of this here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K