Why does commuting matrices have same eigenvectors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter netheril96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between commuting matrices and their eigenvectors, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics and hermitian matrices. Participants seek a rigorous proof of the theorem that commuting matrices share the same eigenvectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a proof for why commuting matrices have the same eigenvectors.
  • Another participant questions whether the inquiry is related to homework or a test, suggesting that assistance may be limited without prior attempts shown.
  • A participant clarifies that their interest is not for homework but arises from reading about quantum physics, seeking a rigorous proof instead.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding hermitian matrices and their eigenvectors, stating that if two hermitian matrices A and B commute, then the eigenspace of A corresponding to an eigenvalue is stable under B, implying that eigenvectors of A can be transformed by B while remaining eigenvectors of A.
  • The explanation elaborates that when B is expressed in a basis of eigenvectors of A, it takes a block diagonal form, with each block corresponding to the eigenvalues of A and containing linearly independent eigenvectors that are also eigenvectors of A.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof, as the discussion includes requests for clarification and elaboration on the topic rather than a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the properties of hermitian matrices and the implications of their commutation, which may not be universally applicable without further context or definitions.

netheril96
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
I googled for a proof,but didn't find one.
Could anyone give me a link to a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework or test problem? If so, you're not likely to get much help without showing what you have tried.
 
Mark44 said:
Is this a homework or test problem? If so, you're not likely to get much help without showing what you have tried.

Neither
I just read a book on quantum physics which mentioned this theorem.I want a rigorous proof.
 
First off, this is QM so let's specialize to hermitian matrices and recall that those always have a complete set of eigenvectors. Suppose A and B are two nxn commuting hermitian matrices over C. And suppose v is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue a: Av=av. Then, A(Bv)=(AB)v=(BA)v=B(Av)=B(av)=a(Bv). That is to say, if v is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue, then Bv is also an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue a. Another way to say this is that the eigenspace V_a of A corresponding to the eigenvalue a is stable under B, meaning B(V_a)\subset V_a.

What this means is that if you write the matrix B with respect to a basis of C^n of the form (b_1,...,b_n) where each b_i is an eigenvector of A and where adjacent vectors correspond to the same eigenvalue, then B will be block diagonal. And each block is itself a hermitian matrix, so for instance if the first block is kxk, then it has k linearly independent eigenvectors. And if (w1,...,wk) is any such eigenvector, then (w1,...,wk,0,...0) is an eigenvector of B. And since it lives in the eigenspace of the first eigenvalue of A, then it is also an eigenvector of A. And so like that, for each mxm block of B we find m linearly independent eigenvectors of B which are also eigenvectors of A.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K