Why Does Density Increase When an Object Moves By?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Increasing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of density changes observed when an object moves past an observer, particularly in the context of relativistic physics. Participants explore the implications of Lorentz contraction and mass-energy density transformations as the object approaches and passes by the observer.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why density is said to increase as an object moves by, despite understanding the concept of density in a moving reference frame.
  • Another participant explains that the density perceived by an observer is influenced by Lorentz contraction, which reduces the volume of the object while mass remains constant.
  • A participant acknowledges understanding of length contraction but questions how density continues to increase as the object approaches.
  • One reply suggests that if the object approaches inertially, the density remains constant but is still higher than in the object's rest frame.
  • Another participant clarifies that the mass-energy density in the observer's frame is constant (if the object's velocity is constant) and greater than the density in the rest frame, providing a quantitative perspective involving the Lorentz factor.
  • Further elaboration includes a discussion on the stress-energy tensor and its relation to density transformations between frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement regarding the influence of Lorentz contraction on perceived density, but there remains uncertainty about the specifics of how density changes as the object moves past the observer. Multiple viewpoints are presented without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made about the object's motion and the conditions under which density is perceived to change. The discussion does not clarify the implications of different types of motion (e.g., inertial vs. non-inertial) on density perception.

jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50
When an object moves by you, I know that its density is supposed to increase (at least that's what I was told by my physics teacher); however, I don't understand why. I understand why the density is greater in a moving reference frame relative to an observer at rest, but why does it continue to increase as it moves by you?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your physics teacher is probably thinking that if a box of mass M and dimension x by y by z traveling in the z direction has its z dimension reduced by the Lorentz contraction. So the volume of the box has apparently shrunk. But mass is conserved.
 
I don't quite follow. I understand that the observer at rest would see the length of the box contract in its direction of motion, and that, assuming work was done on the box, the mass of the box appears to increase as well. However, I do not understand how the density continues to increase as the box approaches the observer.
 
If it approaches inertially then the density will be constant (but higher than the density in the rest frame).
 
That's what I thought. Perhaps that's what my teacher meant by density increasing as the block passes by you. Thanks.
 
As others have said, the mass-energy density rho' in the observer's frame is constant (if velocity is constant) and greater than the density rho as measured in a frame in which the stuff is at rest.

For completeness, I'll make things a bit quantitative, even though jgens does not need an answer at this level.

The two densities differ by two factors of gamma = 1/sqrt(1 - V^2 / c^2), roughly, one for Lorentz contraction and one for the transformation of energy between the two frames. Consequently,

rho' = rho/(1 - v^2 / c^2).

A more sophisticated way to look at it is that density is the zero-zero component of the stress-energy tensor, and there is a factor of gamma for each of the two indices.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K