Why does Fdt go away during collisions while Fdx does not?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of forces during collisions, specifically why the term Fdt goes to zero while Fdx does not. Participants explore concepts related to momentum conservation, energy conservation, and the nature of forces acting on colliding particles, with references to elastic and inelastic collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Fdt goes to zero during collisions due to equal and opposite forces between colliding particles, leading to conservation of linear momentum.
  • Others question the validity of adding forces acting on different systems, suggesting that it is not meaningful to combine forces from separate objects.
  • A participant points out that while momentum is conserved, energy can be converted to other forms, complicating the relationship between Fdt and Fdx.
  • One participant clarifies that Fdx does not go to zero during collisions, indicating that it is a scalar quantity and its magnitudes do not cancel out.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Fdt does not "go to zero" but rather that the integral of Fdt over the collision duration may be zero if no external forces act on the system.
  • There is mention of the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions, with some suggesting that Fdx only goes to zero in elastic collisions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of forces during collisions, particularly regarding the addition of forces from different systems and the implications for momentum and energy conservation. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the treatment of forces, including the potential misunderstanding of combining finite and infinitesimal terms, as well as the need for careful consideration of the definitions and conditions under which momentum and energy conservation apply.

JLT
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
For collisions between particles, Fdt goes to zero while Fdx does not
F = mdv/dt
mv + Fdt = mv
if you have two particles colliding
mva + mvb +Fdt = mva'+mvb'
in the above case, Fdt goes away as there are equal and opposite forces between the two particles during the collision, linear momentum is conserved

but
F = m(dv/dt)(dx/dx)=m(dx/dt)(dv/dx)=mv(dv/dx)
Fdx = mvdv

KE1 + Fdx = KE2
Fdx does not go away during a collision.

Why does Fdt go away during collisions while Fdx does not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JLT said:
mv + Fdt = mv
Where did this come from?

JLT said:
Fdt goes away as there are equal and opposite forces between the two particles
I don't understand. Why are you adding forces on two different objects?
 
forces between two colliding objects. you can set it up so that momentum is conserved, while energy is not conserved.
 
Both momentum and energy are conserved, but energy can be converted from KE to other forms.

But I still don't get why you are adding the forces on two objects. If I have two forces acting on one system then I can add them and get the net force. But if you have two forces acting on two different systems then you don't add them in any meaningful way.
 
Sorry, I should have put a summation sign on the forces:
mVa + mVb + Fab dt + Fba dt = mVa' + mVb' → forces are equal and opposite, cancel out, and you get conservation of linear momentum

0.5 mVa^2 + 0.5mVb^2 + Fab dx + Fba dx = 0.5 m Va'^2 + 0.5 m Vb'^2

I think it is because part of dx does not restore itself after the collision, even though Fab=-Fba Fdx is a scalar quantity not a vector and the magnitudes do not cancel out.
 
JLT said:
Fab dt + Fba dt
Why are you adding Fab and Fba, they are acting on two different systems.
 
This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision
vs. this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inelastic_collision#Perfectly_inelastic_collision

Elastic has conserved energy, while plastic does not. Fdt vs. Fdx. Fdt goes to zero (equal and opposite pairs), Fdx does not go to zero even though it is still equal and opposite pairs??

mava + mbvb + 0 = mava' + mbvb' → this works for both elastic and plastic collisions, Fdt does not care if it is elastic or plastic

0.5mava^2 + 0.5mavb^2 + Fdx = 0.5mava'^2 + 0.5mavb'^2 → Fdx only goes to zero for elastic collisions??
 
JLT said:
For collisions between particles, Fdt goes to zero while Fdx does not
F = mdv/dt
mv + Fdt = mv
if you have two particles colliding
mva + mvb +Fdt = mva'+mvb'
in the above case, Fdt goes away as there are equal and opposite forces between the two particles during the collision, linear momentum is conserved
The formulas in blue are not meaningful. You are adding finite terms (like mv) with terms containing infinitesimals (Fdt).
If you look at the momenta before and after collision, the difference is not Fdt but the integral of Fdt over the duration of collision.
Fdt does not "go to zero" during the collision but the integral (over the duration of interaction) may if there are no forces external to the system under consideration.

Same observation applies to the equations where you add Fdx to finite terms.
 
mva + mvb +Fabdt+Fbadt = mva'+mvb'

Fab = Fba → internal equal and opposite forces, so in the absence of external forces momentum is conserved.

0.5mava^2 + 0.5mavb^2 + Fabdx+Fbadx = 0.5mava'^2 + 0.5mavb'^2

Same scenario, Fab = Fba, only energy is not conserved if the collision is plastic (e < 1)

mv does not care if the collision is an elastic collision (e = 1) or a plastic collision
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
901
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K