Conservation of momentum question - elastic collisions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in the context of elastic collisions and conservation of momentum, specifically involving two identical balls. The original poster presents a scenario where a moving ball collides with a stationary ball, and they are tasked with determining the speeds and directions of both balls post-collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation laws and break down the problem into components but expresses uncertainty about manipulating the equations. Participants discuss expressing resultant velocities in terms of their components and question the use of angles in the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different ways to express velocities and questioning the assumptions regarding the angles involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric identities, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or simplifications.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the angles used in the calculations, particularly whether they should be treated as equal or distinct, which may affect the setup of the equations.

Valerie Prowse
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.0 kg ball moving with a speed of 3.0 m/s hits, elastically, an identical stationary ball as shown. If the first ball moves away with angle 30° to the original path, determine

a. the speed of the first ball after the collision.

b. the speed and direction of the second ball after the collision.

Homework Equations


p = mv

Conservation of momentum
maVa + mbVb = ma'Va' + mb'Vb'

Conservation of KE

1/2maVa^2 + 1/2mbVb^2 = 1/2maVa'^2 + 1/2mbVb'^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have looked at a few solutions on here and elsewhere, but the concept is just not quite clicking yet... I'm not really sure how to mess around with the equations to get what I need. I understand that you have to break it down into components, so:
ma = mb

p(x) = mVa = mVa' + mVb'
mVa = m(Va' + mVb')
Va = Va' + Vb' (and the horizontal components of the velocities are *cosθ)
Va = Va' *cosθ + Vb' *cosθ (the image included with the question shows ball B going below the x-axis at an angle = θ, so I am wondering if the second θ is negative...)
I am not too sure what to do with this information ... maybe solve for Va' or Vb' and leave it there for now? So it would be:

Va' = (Va - Vb' *cosθ)/cosθ
Vb' = (Va - Va' *cosθ)/cosθ

p(y) = mVa + mVb = mVa' + mVb'
0 = Va' + Vb'
0 = Va' *sinθ + Vb' *sinθ (again, not sure if the second θ is negative, since it is below the x axis)
Va' *sinθ = -Vb' *sinθ

Also, from the conservation of energy:

0.5m(Va^2) + 0 = 0.5m(Va'^2 + Vb'^2)
Va^2 = Va'^2 + Vb'^2

I'm stuck after this. I don't know what I'm looking for after this point... Any help is appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you express the resultant velocities of the two masses, after the collision, in terms of their vertical and horizontal components?
 
*the resultant speeds of the two masses.
 
AlephNumbers said:
How can you express the resultant velocities of the two masses, after the collision, in terms of their vertical and horizontal components?

Do you mean like:

Va = sqrt(Va'(x)^2 + Va'(y)^2)

?
 
Yes! Now where can you substitute that information?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Using the components above?

So,

Va = sqrt[ (Va - Vb' *cosθ/cosθ)^2 + (-Vb' *sinθ/sinθ)^2 ]

My problem here is simplifying this.. I'm not really familiar with trigonometric functions, although I was tipped off that I need to somehow incorporate the function of (sinθ)^2 + (cosθ)^2 = 1.

I was able to get [simplified Va'(x) and Va'(y)]:

Va = sqrt[ { (Va/cosθ)-Vb' }^2 + (-Vb')^2]

But I'm stuck now :S Is anyone able to give some hints on how to simplify this further?
 
In the work that has been done here, θ has been used for both the angles involved however, that would denote they are equal correct? when they may not be. Shouldn't we be putting 30 in for the known angle and leaving the unknown angle as θ since we are not sure if they are the same?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
28K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K